Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25911545›Full record

ReviewArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2015

Humidification during laparoscopic surgery: overview of the clinical benefits of using humidified gas during laparoscopic surgery.

Maria Mercedes Binda

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03219398 (Comparison Effect Between Lower Pressure and Standard Pressure Pneumoperitoneum on Sign of Acute Systemic Inflammation, Endothelial Injury, and Acute Kidney Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03219398 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Comparison Effect Between Lower Pressure and Standard Pressure Pneumoperitoneum on Sign of Acute Systemic Inflammation, Endothelial Injury, and Acute Kidney Injury: A Randomized Clinical Trial in Living Donor Laparoscopic Nephrectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndonesia UniversityRan2017 to 2018Enrolled44ConditionsHealthyArmsPneumoperitoneum pressure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Physiological effects of partial amniotic carbon dioxide insufflation with cold, dry vs heated, humidified gas in a sheep model.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Maria Mercedes BindaInstitut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Pôle de Gynécologie, Avenue Mounier 52, bte B1.52.02, 1200, Brussels, Belgium. Mercedes.Binda@uclouvain.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe peritoneum is the serous membrane that covers the abdominal cavity and most of the intra-abdominal organs. It is a very delicate layer highly susceptible to damage and it is not designed to cope with variable conditions such as the dry and cold carbon dioxide (CO2) during laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this review was to evaluate the effects caused by insufflating dry and cold gas into the abdominal cavity after laparoscopic surgery.

methodsA literature search using the Pubmed was carried out. Articles identified focused on the key issues of laparoscopy, peritoneum, morphology, pneumoperitoneum, humidity, body temperature, pain, recovery time, post-operative adhesions and lens fogging.

resultsInsufflating dry and cold CO2 into the abdomen causes peritoneal damage, post-operative pain, hypothermia and post-operative adhesions. Using humidified and warm gas prevents pain after surgery. With regard to hypothermia due to desiccation, it can be fully prevented using humidified and warm gas. Results relating to the patient recovery are still controversial.

conclusionsThe use of humidified and warm insufflation gas offers a significant clinical benefit to the patient, creating a more physiologic peritoneal environment and reducing the post-operative pain and hypothermia. In animal models, although humidified and warm gas reduces post-operative adhesions, humidified gas at 32 °C reduced them even more. It is clear that humidified gas should be used during laparoscopic surgery; however, a question remains unanswered: to achieve even greater clinical benefit to the patient, at what temperature should the humidified gas be when insufflated into the abdomen? More clinical trials should be performed to resolve this query.

Indexed as

HumidityAnimalsCarbon DioxideCold TemperatureHot TemperatureHumansHypothermiaInsufflationLaparoscopyPeritoneumPostoperative PainTissue AdhesionsCarbon DioxideBody temperatureHumidityLaparoscopyPainPneumoperitoneumPost-operative adhesions

Identifiers

PMID25911545
PMCPMC4744605

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.