Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25916593›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015

Sparse conditional logistic regression for analyzing large-scale matched data from epidemiological studies: a simple algorithm.

Marta Avalos, Hélène Pouyes, Yves Grandvalet, Ludivine Orriols, Emmanuel Lagarde

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06365060 (Screening for AL Amyloidosis in Smoldering Multiple Myeloma), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06365060 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Screening for AL Amyloidosis in Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

TypeobservationalSponsorTufts Medical CenterRan2024 to 2029Enrolled400ConditionsSmoldering Multiple Myeloma
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Extending Classification Algorithms to Case-Control Studies.Biomedical engineering and computational biology · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The case-crossover design via penalized regression.BMC medical research methodology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marta Avalos
Hélène Pouyes
Yves Grandvalet
Ludivine Orriols
Emmanuel Lagarde

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper considers the problem of estimation and variable selection for large high-dimensional data (high number of predictors p and large sample size N, without excluding the possibility that N < p) resulting from an individually matched case-control study. We develop a simple algorithm for the adaptation of the Lasso and related methods to the conditional logistic regression model. Our proposal relies on the simplification of the calculations involved in the likelihood function. Then, the proposed algorithm iteratively solves reweighted Lasso problems using cyclical coordinate descent, computed along a regularization path. This method can handle large problems and deal with sparse features efficiently. We discuss benefits and drawbacks with respect to the existing available implementations. We also illustrate the interest and use of these techniques on a pharmacoepidemiological study of medication use and traffic safety.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, TheoreticalMolecular EpidemiologyAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCase-Control StudiesHumansLikelihood FunctionsLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedRegression AnalysisSample SizeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25916593
PMCPMC4416185

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.