Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25970635›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

High resolution mapping of enhancer-promoter interactions.

Christopher Reeder, Michael Closser, Huay Mei Poh, Kuljeet Sandhu, Hynek Wichterle, David Gifford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christopher ReederComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Michael ClosserDepartments of Pathology and Cell Biology, Neurology, and Neuroscience, Center for Motor Neuron Biology and Disease, Columbia Stem Cell Initiative, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
Huay Mei PohGenome Institute of Singapore, Singapore.
Kuljeet SandhuDepartment of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), Knowledge City, Mohali, India.
Hynek WichterleDepartments of Pathology and Cell Biology, Neurology, and Neuroscience, Center for Motor Neuron Biology and Disease, Columbia Stem Cell Initiative, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
David GiffordComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Funding

Motor neuron selector genes and mechanism of their actionR01NS078097 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WICHTERLE, HYNEK · 2012 to 2016
$2.7M
Integrated Genome Discovery at Single Base Pair ResolutionU01HG007037 · NHGRI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GIFFORD, DAVID K · 2012 to 2015
$2.2M
Motor neuron selector genes and mechanism of their actionR56NS078097 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WICHTERLE, HYNEK · 2017 to 2017
$593k
NHGRI NIH HHS 1U01HG007037NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG007037NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS078097NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS078097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA Polymerase II ChIA-PET data has revealed enhancers that are active in a profiled cell type and the genes that the enhancers regulate through chromatin interactions. The most commonly used computational method for analyzing ChIA-PET data, the ChIA-PET Tool, discovers interaction anchors at a spatial resolution that is insufficient to accurately identify individual enhancers. We introduce Germ, a computational method that estimates the likelihood that any two narrowly defined genomic locations are jointly occupied by RNA Polymerase II. Germ takes a blind deconvolution approach to simultaneously estimate the likelihood of RNA Polymerase II occupation as well as a model of the arrangement of read alignments relative to locations occupied by RNA Polymerase II. Both types of information are utilized to estimate the likelihood that RNA Polymerase II jointly occupies any two genomic locations. We apply Germ to RNA Polymerase II ChIA-PET data from embryonic stem cells to identify the genomic locations that are jointly occupied along with transcription start sites. We show that these genomic locations align more closely with features of active enhancers measured by ChIP-Seq than the locations identified using the ChIA-PET Tool. We also apply Germ to RNA Polymerase II ChIA-PET data from motor neuron progenitors. Based on the Germ results, we observe that a combination of cell type specific and cell type independent regulatory interactions are utilized by cells to regulate gene expression.

Indexed as

Enhancer Elements, GeneticGenomePromoter Regions, GeneticSoftwareAnimalsChromatinChromatin ImmunoprecipitationChromosome MappingEmbryonic Stem CellsGene Expression RegulationGenetic LociMiceMice, TransgenicNeural Stem CellsPrimary Cell CultureRNA Polymerase IIChromatinRNA Polymerase II

Identifiers

PMID25970635
PMCPMC4430501

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.