SynthesisEndocrine2015
Comparisons of the efficacy of glucose control, lipid profile, and β-cell function between DPP-4 inhibitors and AGI treatment in type 2 diabetes patients: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Endocrine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acarbose With Comparable Glucose-Lowering but Superior Weight-Loss Efficacy to Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2020Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Head-to-Head Comparison of the Hypoglycemic Efficacy and Safety Between Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors and α-Glucosidase Inhibitors in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019Pooled it
- Meta-analysis and critical review on the efficacy and safety of alpha-glucosidase inhibitors in Asian and non-Asian populations.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2018Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin added to metformin and insulin compared with voglibose in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2019 · on this mapTrial
- Machine learning-based online prediction of nocturnal hypoglycemia in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Suppression of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Formation in Mice by Teneligliptin, a Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2018Article
- Omarigliptin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.Endocrine · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor treatment with α-glucosidase inhibitor (AGI) treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes through a meta-analysis. Studies were identified by a literature search of Medline, Embase, and others from the time that recording commenced until December 2014. The meta-analysis was performed by computing the weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) for a change from baseline to the study endpoint for DPP-4 inhibitors versus AGIs. Nine randomized controlled trial were judged to be appropriate for inclusion in the meta-analysis. One thousand and forty-six patients were treated with a DPP-4 inhibitor, while 929 patients were treated with AGI treatment; the groups had a comparable baseline body mass index of 25.5 ± 1.3 kg/m(2) and mean baseline HbA1c of 7.83 ± 0.53 %. Treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors led to a significantly greater change from baseline in the HbA1c levels (WMD -0.30 %; 95 % CI -0.47 to -0.13 %, p < 0.001) and fasting plasma glucose levels (WMD -0.50 mmol/L; 95 % CI -0.89 to -0.11 mmol/L, p = 0.01) compared with AGI treatment. Compared with AGIs, treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors was associated with a significantly greater increase in the weight change from baseline (WMD 0.89 kg; 95 % CI 0.53-1.25, p < 0.001). Treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors was associated with a significantly greater increase in the fasting insulin level from baseline (WMD 0.63 µU/mL; 95 % CI 0.35-0.90 µU/mL, p < 0.001). DPP-4 inhibitors significantly improved homeostatic model assessment for β-cell function in type 2 diabetes patients compared with AGI treatment (WMD 5.43; 95 % CI 1.01-9.85, p = 0.02). DPP-4 inhibitors were associated with a significantly greater decrease in the cholesterol (CHO) level (WMD -0.19 mmol/L; 95 % CI -0.19 to -0.19 mmol/L, p < 0.001) and a significantly greater decrease in the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level (WMD -0.16 mmol/L; 95 % CI -0.26 to -0.05 mmol/L, p = 0.003). Compared with AGIs (813 participants), treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors (1031 participants) was associated with a significantly lower incidence of drug-related adverse event (OR 0.48; 95 % CI 0.36-0.64, p < 0.0001). The efficacy of glucose control and improvement of β-cell function, as well as total CHO and LDL-C decreases, in DPP-4 inhibitor treatment were superior to those with AGI treatment, and there was a lower incidence of drug-related AE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.