Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26064040›Full record

ArticleCancer informatics2015

Powerful Tukey's One Degree-of-Freedom Test for Detecting Gene-Gene and Gene-Environment Interactions.

Yaping Wang, Donghui Li, Peng Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer informatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yaping WangDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center.
Donghui LiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Peng WeiDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center ; Human Genetics Center, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

Association analysis of rare variants with sequencing dataR01HL116720 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAN, WEI, WEI, PENG · 2013 to 2020
$3.3M
Molecular Epidemiology of Pancreatic CancerR01CA098380 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI LI, DONGHUI · 2004 to 2008
$2.6M
Genetic Susceptibility and Risk Model for Pancreatic CancerR01CA169122 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI WEI, PENG · 2013 to 2016
$1.1M
Genome-wide gene-by-smoking interaction analysis of pulmonary functionR21HL126032 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MORRISON, ALANNA C, WEI, PENG · 2015 to 2017
$462k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA098380NCI NIH HHS R01 CA169122NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL116720NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL126032Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) robustly associated with hundreds of complex human diseases including cancers. However, the large number of GWAS-identified genetic loci only explains a small proportion of the disease heritability. This "missing heritability" problem has been partly attributed to the yet-to-be-identified gene-gene (G × G) and gene-environment (G × E) interactions. In spite of the important roles of G × G and G × E interactions in understanding disease mechanisms and filling in the missing heritability, straightforward GWAS scanning for such interactions has very limited statistical power, leading to few successes. Here we propose a two-step statistical approach to test G × G/G × E interactions: the first step is to perform principal component analysis (PCA) on the multiple SNPs within a gene region, and the second step is to perform Tukey's one degree-of-freedom (1-df) test on the leading PCs. We derive a score test that is computationally fast and numerically stable for the proposed Tukey's 1-df interaction test. Using extensive simulations we show that the proposed approach, which combines the two parsimonious models, namely, the PCA and Tukey's 1-df form of interaction, outperforms other state-of-the-art methods. We also demonstrate the utility and efficiency gains of the proposed method with applications to testing G × G interactions for Crohn's disease using the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium (WTCCC) GWAS data and testing G × E interaction using data from a case-control study of pancreatic cancer.

Indexed as

G × E interactionG × G interactionGWASPCASNPTukey’s 1-df test

Identifiers

PMID26064040
PMCPMC4459566

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.