Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26083024›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2015

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Safety of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Inhibitors for the Treatment of Retinopathy of Prematurity.

Laura Pertl, Gernot Steinwender, Christoph Mayer, Silke Hausberger, Eva-Maria Pöschl, Werner Wackernagel, Andreas Wedrich, Yosuf El-Shabrawi, Anton Haas

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Visual field after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy and laser treatment for retinopathy of prematurity.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura PertlDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical University Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 4, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Gernot SteinwenderDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical University Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 4, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Christoph MayerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical University Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 4, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Silke HausbergerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical University Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 4, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Eva-Maria PöschlDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical University Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 4, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Werner WackernagelDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical University Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 4, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Andreas WedrichDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical University Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 4, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Yosuf El-ShabrawiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Klagenfurt Hospital, Feschnigstraße 11, 9020, Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Austria.
Anton HaasDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical University Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 4, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Medical University of Graz · ATKlinikum Klagenfurt · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLaser photocoagulation is the current gold standard treatment for proliferative retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). However, it permanently reduces the visual field and might induce myopia. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors for the treatment of ROP may enable continuing vascularization of the retina, potentially allowing the preservation of the visual field. However, for their use in infants concern remains. This meta-analysis explores the safety of VEGF inhibitors.

methodsThe Ovid Interface was used to perform a systematic review of the literature in the databases PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library.

resultsThis meta-analysis included 24 original reports (including 1.457 eyes) on VEGF inhibitor treatment for ROP. The trials were solely observational except for one randomized and two case-control studies. We estimated a 6-month risk of retreatment per eye of 2.8%, and a 6-month risk of ocular complication without the need of retreatment of 1.6% per eye. Systemic complications were only reported as isolated incidents. DISCUSSION: VEGF inhibitors seem to be associated with low recurrence rates and ocular complication rates. They may have the benefit of potentially allowing the preservation of visual field and lower rates of myopia. Due to the lack of data, the risk of systemic side effects cannot be assessed.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsHumansRetinaRetinopathy of PrematurityVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAngiogenesis InhibitorsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID26083024
PMCPMC4470662
OpenAlexW1578008435

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.