Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26089435›Full record

ReviewIntegrative and comparative biology2015

Parallel Evolution and Lineage-Specific Expansion of RNA Editing in Ctenophores.

Andrea B Kohn, Rachel S Sanford, Masa-aki Yoshida, Leonid L Moroz

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Integrative and comparative biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Nitric oxide suppresses cilia activity in ctenophores.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. ADAR RNA editing below the backbone.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2017
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Independent origins of neurons and synapses: insights from ctenophores.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrea B Kohn*The Whitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience, University of Florida, 9505 Ocean Shore Blvd, St Augustine, FL 32080, USA;
Rachel S Sanford*The Whitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience, University of Florida, 9505 Ocean Shore Blvd, St Augustine, FL 32080, USA; Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA;
Masa-aki Yoshida*The Whitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience, University of Florida, 9505 Ocean Shore Blvd, St Augustine, FL 32080, USA; Research fellow of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Center for Information Biology, National Institute of Genetics, 1111 Yata, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan;
Leonid L Moroz*The Whitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience, University of Florida, 9505 Ocean Shore Blvd, St Augustine, FL 32080, USA; Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA; McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA moroz@whitney.ufl.edu.
University of Florida · USUniversity of St. Augustine for Health Sciences · US

Funding

Genomic Approaches to Deciphering Memory CircuitsR01MH097062 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI JU, JINGYUE, KANDEL, ERIC R · 2012 to 2016
$2.0M
Genomic Bases of Behavioral Learning: Single Cell ApproachesR01GM097502 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI HAWKINS, ROBERT D, MOROZ, LEONID L · 2011 to 2014
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01GM097502NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH097062NIMH NIH HHS R01MH097062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA editing is a process of targeted alterations of nucleotides in all types of RNA molecules (e.g., rRNA, tRNA, mRNA, and miRNA). As a result, the transcriptional output differs from its genomic DNA template. RNA editing can be defined both by biochemical mechanisms and by enzymes that perform these reactions. There are high levels of RNA editing detected in the mammalian nervous system, suggesting that nervous systems use this mechanism to increase protein diversity, because the post-transcription modifications lead to new gene products with novel functions. By re-annotating the ctenophore genomes, we found that the number of predicted RNA-editing enzymes is comparable to the numbers in mammals, but much greater than in other non-bilaterian basal metazoans. However, the overall molecular diversity of RNA-editing enzymes in ctenophores is lower, suggesting a possible "compensation" by an expansion of the ADAT1-like subfamily in this lineage. In two genera of ctenophores, Pleurobrachia and Mnemiopsis, there are high levels of expression for RNA-editing enzymes in their aboral organs, the integrative center involved in control of locomotion and geotaxis. This finding supports the hypothesis that RNA editing is correlated with the complexity of tissues and behaviors. Smaller numbers of RNA-editing enzymes in Porifera and Placozoa also correlates with the primary absence of neural and muscular systems in these lineages. In ctenophores, the expansion of the RNA-editing machinery can also provide mechanisms that support the remarkable capacity for regeneration in these animals. In summary, despite their compact genomes, a wide variety of epigenomic mechanisms employed by ctenophores and other non-bilaterian basal metazoans can provide novel insights into the evolutionary origins of biological novelties.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsCtenophoraRNA Editing

Identifiers

PMID26089435
PMCPMC4836447
OpenAlexW2251041072

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.