Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26099795›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2015

An anatomy-based lumped parameter model of cerebrospinal venous circulation: can an extracranial anatomical change impact intracranial hemodynamics?

Stefania Marcotti, Lara Marchetti, Pietro Cecconi, Emiliano Votta, Gianfranco Beniamino Fiore, Antonello Barberio, Stefano Viotti, Alberto Redaelli, Maria Marcella Laganà

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Neck Vessel Cross-Sectional Area Measured with MRI: Scan-Rescan Reproducibility for Longitudinal Evaluations.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stefania MarcottiDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo Da Vinci, 32, 20133, Milan, Italy. stefania.marcotti@mail.polimi.it.
Lara MarchettiDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo Da Vinci, 32, 20133, Milan, Italy. lara.marchetti@mail.polimi.it.
Pietro CecconiMagnetic Resonance Laboratory, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, IRCCS Santa Maria Nascente, Via Capecelatro 66, 20148, Milan, Italy. pcecconi@dongnocchi.it.
Emiliano VottaDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo Da Vinci, 32, 20133, Milan, Italy. emiliano.votta@polimi.it.
Gianfranco Beniamino FioreDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo Da Vinci, 32, 20133, Milan, Italy. gianfranco.fiore@polimi.it.
Antonello BarberioMagnetic Resonance Laboratory, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, IRCCS Santa Maria Nascente, Via Capecelatro 66, 20148, Milan, Italy. antonellobar@yahoo.it.
Stefano ViottiMagnetic Resonance Laboratory, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, IRCCS Santa Maria Nascente, Via Capecelatro 66, 20148, Milan, Italy. stefano.viotti@gmail.com.
Alberto RedaelliDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo Da Vinci, 32, 20133, Milan, Italy. alberto.redaelli@polimi.it.
Maria Marcella LaganàMagnetic Resonance Laboratory, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, IRCCS Santa Maria Nascente, Via Capecelatro 66, 20148, Milan, Italy. mlagana@dongnocchi.it.
Politecnico di Milano · ITDon Carlo Gnocchi Foundation · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe relationship between extracranial venous system abnormalities and central nervous system disorders has been recently theorized. In this paper we delve into this hypothesis by modeling the venous drainage in brain and spinal column areas and simulating the intracranial flow changes due to extracranial morphological stenoses.

methodsA lumped parameter model of the cerebro-spinal venous drainage was created based on anatomical knowledge and vessels diameters and lengths taken from literature. Each vein was modeled as a hydraulic resistance, calculated through Poiseuille's law. The inputs of the model were arterial flow rates of the intracranial, vertebral and lumbar districts. The effects of the obstruction of the main venous outflows were simulated. A database comprising 112 Multiple Sclerosis patients (Male/Female = 42/70; median age ± standard deviation = 43.7 ± 10.5 years) was retrospectively analyzed.

resultsThe flow rate of the main veins estimated with the model was similar to the measures of 21 healthy controls (Male/Female = 10/11; mean age ± standard deviation = 31 ± 11 years), obtained with a 1.5 T Magnetic Resonance scanner. The intracranial reflux topography predicted with the model in cases of internal jugular vein diameter reduction was similar to those observed in the patients with internal jugular vein obstacles.

conclusionsThe proposed model can predict physiological and pathological behaviors with good fidelity. Despite the simplifications introduced in cerebrospinal venous circulation modeling, the key anatomical feature of the lumped parameter model allowed for a detailed analysis of the consequences of extracranial venous impairments on intracranial pressure and hemodynamics.

Indexed as

AdultBrainCase-Control StudiesCerebrovascular CirculationFemaleHemodynamicsHumansIntracranial PressureJugular VeinsMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26099795
PMCPMC4476203
OpenAlexW2156787815

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.