Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26100250›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2015

Detection of selection signatures in Piemontese and Marchigiana cattle, two breeds with similar production aptitudes but different selection histories.

Silvia Sorbolini, Gabriele Marras, Giustino Gaspa, Corrado Dimauro, Massimo Cellesi, Alessio Valentini, Nicolò Pp Macciotta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Signature of Selection Analysis Reveals Candidate Genes Related to Climate Adaptation and Production Traits in Lao Native Goats.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Silvia SorboliniDipartimento di Agraria, Sezione di Scienze Zootecniche Università degli Studi di Sassari, 07100, Sassari, Italy. ssorbolini@uniss.it.
Gabriele MarrasDipartimento di Agraria, Sezione di Scienze Zootecniche Università degli Studi di Sassari, 07100, Sassari, Italy. gbmarras@uniss.it.
Giustino GaspaDipartimento di Agraria, Sezione di Scienze Zootecniche Università degli Studi di Sassari, 07100, Sassari, Italy. gigaspa@uniss.it.
Corrado DimauroDipartimento di Agraria, Sezione di Scienze Zootecniche Università degli Studi di Sassari, 07100, Sassari, Italy. dimauro@uniss.it.
Massimo CellesiDipartimento di Agraria, Sezione di Scienze Zootecniche Università degli Studi di Sassari, 07100, Sassari, Italy. mcellesi@uniss.it.
Alessio ValentiniDipartimento per l'Innovazione dei Sistemi Biologici Agroalimentari e Forestali DIBAF, Università della Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy. alessio@unitus.it.
Nicolò Pp MacciottaDipartimento di Agraria, Sezione di Scienze Zootecniche Università degli Studi di Sassari, 07100, Sassari, Italy. macciott@uniss.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDomestication and selection are processes that alter the pattern of within- and between-population genetic variability. They can be investigated at the genomic level by tracing the so-called selection signatures. Recently, sequence polymorphisms at the genome-wide level have been investigated in a wide range of animals. A common approach to detect selection signatures is to compare breeds that have been selected for different breeding goals (i.e. dairy and beef cattle). However, genetic variations in different breeds with similar production aptitudes and similar phenotypes can be related to differences in their selection history.

methodsIn this study, we investigated selection signatures between two Italian beef cattle breeds, Piemontese and Marchigiana, using genotyping data that was obtained with the Illumina BovineSNP50 BeadChip. The comparison was based on the fixation index (Fst), combined with a locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOWESS) regression and a control chart approach. In addition, analyses of Fst were carried out to confirm candidate genes. In particular, data were processed using the varLD method, which compares the regional variation of linkage disequilibrium between populations.

resultsGenome scans confirmed the presence of selective sweeps in the genomic regions that harbour candidate genes that are known to affect productive traits in cattle such as DGAT1, ABCG2, CAPN3, MSTN and FTO. In addition, several new putative candidate genes (for example ALAS1, ABCB8, ACADS and SOD1) were detected.

conclusionsThis study provided evidence on the different selection histories of two cattle breeds and the usefulness of genomic scans to detect selective sweeps even in cattle breeds that are bred for similar production aptitudes.

Indexed as

Selection, GeneticAnimalsCattleDatabases, GeneticLinkage DisequilibriumPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LociSelective Breeding

Identifiers

PMID26100250
PMCPMC4476081

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.