Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26153241›Full record

ArticleExpert opinion on pharmacotherapy2015

Evaluation of the SIGNIFY trial.

Guido Grassi

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Guido GrassiClinica Medica, University of Milano Bicocca and Istituto di Ricerche e Cura a Caratttere Scientifico IRCCS Multimedica , Sesto San Giovanni, Milan , Italy guido.grassi@unimib.it.
MultiMedica · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A reduction in the heart rate has been thought to be beneficial in coronary artery disease. The study assessing the morbidity-mortality Benefits of the If Inhibitor, Ivabradine, in patients with coronary artery disease (SIGNIFY) tested this hypothesis. It specifically evaluated the effects of ivabradine, administered at the dosage of 5 - 10 mg/bid in addition to current drug treatment, on cardiovascular outcome in 19102 patients with heart rate ≥ 70 bpm in normal sinus rhythm and stable coronary artery disease without heart failure. The primary endpoint of the trial, whose follow-up averaged for 2.3 years, was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes or nonfatal myocardial infarction whereas the secondary endpoint was represented by the primary endpoint plus total mortality. The incidence of the primary endpoint was at the study end similar in the ivabradine-treated and in the placebo-treated group (6.8 vs 6.4%, p = NS). Superimposable was also the incidence of death for cardiovascular events and for nonfatal myocardial infarction. However, in the 12049 patients with angina class II or higher ivabradine significantly increased the incidence of primary endpoint as compared to placebo (7.6 vs 6.5%, p < 0.02). This was associated with a significantly greater incidence of bradycardia, atrial fibrillation and Q-T prolongation. Taken together the results of the SIGNIFY do not support the clinical benefits of ivabradine in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Indexed as

BenzazepinesCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleBenzazepinesatrial fibrillationcoronary artery diseaseheart rateivabradineJ curve

Identifiers

PMID26153241
OpenAlexW1525584092

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.