Evidence mapPaperPMID 26169803Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2015

Group Medical Visits (GMVs) in primary care: an RCT of group-based versus individual appointments to reduce HbA1c in older people.

Karim M Khan, Adriaan Windt, Jennifer C Davis, Martin Dawes, Teresa Liu-Ambrose, Ken Madden, Carlo A Marra, Laura Housden, Christiane Hoppmann, David J Adams

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02002143 (Group Medical Visits), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02002143 naunknown statusnot on this map

Group Medical Visits (GMVs) in Primary Care: An RCT of Group-Based Versus Individual Appointments to Reduce HbA1c in Older People

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2014 to 2020Enrolled128ConditionsType 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)ArmsGroup Appointments, Individual Appointments (IAs)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. New model for diabetes primary health care based on patient empowerment and the right to preventive health: the MIDE program.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2017
    Article
  6. Did You Hear What I Meant to Say?Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karim M KhanCentre for Mobility and Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Adriaan WindtDepartment of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jennifer C DavisDepartment of Population & Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Martin DawesDepartment of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Teresa Liu-AmbroseDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Ken MaddenDepartment of Medicine (Geriatric Medicine), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Carlo A MarraFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Laura HousdenSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Christiane HoppmannPsychology Department, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
David J AdamsDepartment of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

CIHR 131692-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionType 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) affects more than 1.1 million Canadians aged ≥65 years. Group Medical Visits are an emerging health service delivery method. Recent systematic reviews show that they can significantly reduce glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, but Group Visits have not been evaluated within primary care. We intend to determine the clinical effectiveness, quality of life and economic implications of Group Medical Visits within a primary care setting for older people with T2DM. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A 2-year proof-of-concept, single-blinded (measurement team) randomised control trial to test the efficacy of Group Medical Visits in an urban Canadian primary care setting. Participants ≥65 years old with T2DM (N=128) will be equally randomised to either eight groups of eight patients each (Group Medical Visits; Intervention) or to Individual visits (Standard Care; Controls). Those administering cointerventions are not blinded to group assignment. Our sample size is based on estimates of variance (±1.4% for HbA1c) and effect size (0.9/1.4=0.6) from the literature and from our own preliminary data. Forty participants per group will provide a β likelihood of 0.80, assuming an α of 0.05. A conservative estimation of an effect size of 0.7/1.4 changes the N in the power calculation to 59 per group. Hence, we aim to enrol 64 participants in each study arm. We will use intention-to-treat analysis and compare mean HbA1c (% glycosylated HbA1c) (primary outcome) of Intervention/Control participants at 12 months, 24 months and 1 year postintervention on selected clinical, patient-rated and economic measures. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02002143.

Indexed as

Appointments and SchedulesAgedAged, 80 and overCanadaCost-Benefit AnalysisDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Disease ManagementFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansMalePatient Education as TopicPrimary Health CareQuality of LifeSelf CareSingle-Blind MethodGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanPRIMARY CAREPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID26169803
PMCPMC4513482
OpenAlexW1922876915

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.