Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26201718›Full record

Trial reportTrials2015

Non-sedation versus sedation with a daily wake-up trial in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation--effects on physical function: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial: a substudy of the NONSEDA trial.

Helene Korvenius Nedergaard, Hanne Irene Jensen, Jørgen T Lauridsen, Gisela Sjøgaard, Palle Toft

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02034942 nacompletednot on this map

Substudy of Non-Seda Trial (NCT01967680): Non-sedation Versus Sedation With a Daily Wake-up Trial in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation - Effects on Physical Function. An Investigator-initiated, Randomised, Clinical, Parallel-group, Multinational, Superiority Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPalle ToftRan2014 to 2019Enrolled205ConditionsCritically Ill, Muscular AtrophyArmsNon-sedation, Sedation, control
NCT03172897 phase4suspendednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Low-dose Dexmedetomidine for Delirium Prevention in Mechanically Ventilated Patients in Intensive Care Unit: a Multicenter, Randomised, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking University First HospitalRan2017 to 2025Enrolled260ConditionsAdult Disease, Intensive Care Unit Syndrome, Mechanical Ventilation Complication, DeliriumArmsDexmedetomidine, Placebo (normal saline)
NCT03335527 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Low-Dose Dexmedetomidine on Sleep Quality in Mechanical Ventilation Patients After Surgery in Intensive Care Unit: a Pilot Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking University First HospitalRan2017 to 2019Enrolled80ConditionsAged, Postoperative Period, Intensive Care Units, Mechanical Ventilation ComplicationArmsDexmedetomidine, Placebo (normal saline)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Helene Korvenius NedergaardDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Lillebaelt Hospital, Skovvangen 2-8, DK-6000, Kolding, Denmark. helene.korvenius.jorgensen@rsyd.dk.
Hanne Irene JensenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Lillebaelt Hospital, Skovvangen 2-8, DK-6000, Kolding, Denmark. hanne.irene.jensen@rsyd.dk.
Jørgen T LauridsenDepartment of Business and Economics, Centre of Health Economics research, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230, Odense M, Denmark. jtl@sam.sdu.dk.
Gisela SjøgaardDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230, Odense M, Denmark. gsjogaard@health.sdu.dk.
Palle ToftDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, DK-5000, Odense C, Denmark. palle.toft@rsyd.dk.
Lillebaelt Hospital · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKOdense University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCritically ill patients rapidly loose much of their muscle mass and strength. This can be attributed to prolonged admission, prolonged mechanical ventilation and increased mortality, and it can have a negative impact on the degree of independence and quality of life. In the NONSEDA trial we randomize critically ill patients to non-sedation or sedation with a daily wake-up trial during mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit. It has never been assessed whether non-sedation affects physical function. The aim of this study is to assess the effects of non-sedation versus sedation with a daily wake-up trial on physical function after discharge from intensive care unit. METHODS/

designInvestigator-initiated, randomized, clinical, parallel-group, superiority trial, including 700 patients in total, with a substudy concerning 200 of these patients. Inclusion criteria will be intubated, mechanically ventilated patients with expected duration of mechanical ventilation >24 h. Exclusion criteria will be patients with severe head trauma, coma at admission or status epilepticus, patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia, patients with PaO2/FiO2<9 where sedation might be necessary to ensure sufficient oxygenation or placing the patient in a prone position. The experimental intervention will be non-sedation supplemented with pain management during mechanical ventilation. The control intervention will be sedation with a daily wake-up trial. The co-primary outcome will be quality of life regarding physical function (SF-36, physical component) and degree of independence in activities of daily living (Barthel Index), and this will be assessed for all 700 patients participating in the NONSEDA trial. The secondary outcomes, which will be assessed for the subpopulation of 200 NONSEDA patients in the trial site, Kolding, will be 6-min walking distance, handgrip strength, muscle size (ultrasonographic measurement of the rectus femoris muscle cross-sectional area) and biomechanical data on lower extremity function (maximal voluntary contraction, rate of force development and endurance). DISCUSSION: This study is the first to investigate the effect of no sedation during critical illness on physical function. If an effect is found, it will add important information on how to prevent muscle weakness following critical illness.

trial registrationThe study has been approved by the relevant scientific ethics committee and is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT02034942, 9 January 2014).

Indexed as

Health StatusRespiration, ArtificialActivities of Daily LivingClinical ProtocolsCritical IllnessDenmarkExercise ToleranceHand StrengthHumansHypnotics and SedativesIntensive Care UnitsMuscle ContractionMuscle WeaknessMuscular AtrophyPatient DischargeQuadriceps MuscleHypnotics and Sedatives

Identifiers

PMID26201718
PMCPMC4511451
OpenAlexW1722345409

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.