Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26226345›Full record

ReviewJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2015

Potential mechanisms and applications of statins on osteogenesis: Current modalities, conflicts and future directions.

Ahmad Oryan, Amir Kamali, Ali Moshiri

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05613400 (The Effect of Simvastatin on Bone Density in Postmenopausal Women With Type 2 Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 67 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05613400 phase4unknown statusstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Simvastatin on Bone Density in Postmenopausal Women With Type 2 Diabetes: a Double-blind, Randomized Active-comparator (Ezetimibe) Controlled Clinical Trial

Ran2022Enrolled240Registered outcomes7Posted comparisons0ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsEzetimibe 10mg, Simvastatin 10mg
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Statins as Repurposed Drugs in Gynecological Cancer: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Efficacy of statins for osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ahmad OryanDepartment of Pathology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. Electronic address: oryan@shirazu.ac.ir.
Amir KamaliDepartment of Pathology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
Ali MoshiriRazi Drug Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Division of Surgery and Radiology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
Shiraz University · IRIran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Statins are known for their beneficial effects on cardiovascular diseases. Besides the lipid-lowering properties, statins exert their anabolic effects on the bone by differentiating mesenchymal cells to osteoblasts via upregulating BMP-2 and protecting osteoblasts from apoptosis. In addition, statins have been suggested to be anti-osteoclastic by reducing the osteoclast differentiation and activity. Several in vivo and clinical studies have confirmed the beneficial effects of statins in the treatment of osteoporosis and fracture injuries. However, controversial results exist showing statins may have no benefit and in some instances, they may retard bone repair. Different factors such as type, route of administration, dose and dosage of statins, and the injury model seem to be involved for such controversies. In the present study, the most important issues regarding statins have been reviewed to find out how statins may be beneficial and statin therapy can be improved for treating osteoporosis and fracture injuries. The lipophilic statins particularly simvastatin and atorvastatin are the most investigated statins with beneficial results on bone healing and turnover. Most of the in vivo and clinical studies performed systemic route of administration for treating osteoporosis, with much higher clinical doses than the lipid lowering therapy, which increases the statin related side and out of target effects. In contrast, most of the in vivo studies that used statins for fracture repair have applied local delivery methods with much lower doses via tissue engineering approaches. However, local delivery of statins and statin therapy for fracture repair both have low application in the clinical setting and such methods are still under in vivo investigation. Future clinical trials are needed to elucidate how delivery systems and tissue engineering technologies are able to improve the outcome of statin therapy.

Indexed as

Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsOsteogenesisOsteoporosisHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsAnabolic mechanismBone healingDrug delivery systemsRoutes of administrationStatin

Identifiers

PMID26226345
OpenAlexW952197207

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.