Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26246808›Full record

ReviewStem cells international2015

Umbilical Cord Tissue-Derived Cells as Therapeutic Agents.

Olga Maslova, Miroslav Novak, Peter Kruzliak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cells international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Cell Therapy-a Basic Science Primer for the Sports Medicine Clinician.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2019
    Review
  6. Cryopreservation and its clinical applications.Integrative medicine research · 2017
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Olga MaslovaNational Taras Shevchenko University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine ; Hemafund Ltd., Lisozakhysna Street 5, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Miroslav NovakInternational Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital and Masaryk University, Pekarska 53, 656 91 Brno, Czech Republic.
Peter KruzliakInternational Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital and Masaryk University, Pekarska 53, 656 91 Brno, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the characteristics of SC, including UC-derived cells, are a dramatically discussed issue, this review will focus particularly on some controversial issues regarding clinical utility of cells isolated from UC tissue. UC-derived cells have several advantages compared to other types and sources of stem cells. The impact of UC topography on cell characteristics is briefly discussed. The necessity to adapt existing methods of cell isolation and culturing to GMP conditions is mentioned, as well as possible cryopreservation of this material. Light is shed on some future perspectives for UC-derived cells.

Identifiers

PMID26246808
PMCPMC4515303

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.