Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26267871›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted diseases2015

Patient-Reported Expedited Partner Therapy for Gonorrhea in the United States: Findings of the STD Surveillance Network 2010-2012.

Mark R Stenger, Roxanne P Kerani, Heidi M Bauer, Nicole Burghardt, Greta L Anschuetz, Ellen Klingler, Christina M Schumacher, Julie Simon, Matthew Golden

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Increases in Neisseria gonorrhoeae With Reduced Susceptibility to Azithromycin Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in Seattle, King County, Washington, 2012-2016.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Mark R StengerFrom the *Division of STD Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA; †University of Washington School of Medicine/Public Health-Seattle and King County, Seattle, WA; ‡California Department of Public Health, Sacramento, CA; §Philadelphia Department of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA; ¶New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, NY; ∥Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine/Baltimore City Health Department, Baltimore, MD; and **Washington State Department of Health, Olympia, WA.
Roxanne P Kerani
Heidi M Bauer
Nicole Burghardt
Greta L Anschuetz
Ellen Klingler
Christina M Schumacher
Julie Simon
Matthew Golden
California Department of Public Health · USPublic Health – Seattle & King County · USJohns Hopkins University · USNational Center for HIV/AIDS Viral Hepatitis STD and TB Prevention · USNew York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene · USPhiladelphia Department of Public Health · US

Funding

A community-level RCT of expedited partner treatment for gonorrhea and chlamydiaR01AI068107 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GOLDEN, MATTHEW R · 2006 to 2010
$2.9M
Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NCHHSTP CDC HHS PS08-0865NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI068107NIAID NIH HHS R01AI068107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExpedited partner therapy (EPT) has been shown to prevent reinfection in persons with gonorrhea and to plausibly reduce incidence. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends EPT as an option for treating sex partners of heterosexual patients. Few studies that examine how the reported use of this valuable intervention differs by patient and provider characteristics and by geography across multiple jurisdictions in the United States are currently available.

methodsCase and patient interview data were obtained for a random sample of reported cases from 7 geographically disparate US jurisdictions participating in the Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Surveillance Network. These data were weighted to be representative of all reported gonorrhea cases in the 7 study sites. Patient receipt of EPT was estimated, and multivariate models were constructed separately to examine factors associated with receipt of EPT for heterosexuals and for men who have sex with men.

resultsOverall, 5.4% of patients diagnosed and reported as having gonorrhea reported receiving EPT to treat their sex partners. Heterosexual patients were more likely to have received EPT than men who have sex with men at 6.6% and 2.6% of patients, respectively. Receipt of EPT did not vary significantly by race, Hispanic ethnicity, or age for either group, although significant variation was observed in different provider settings, with patients from family planning/reproductive health and STD clinic settings more likely to report receiving EPT. Jurisdiction variations were also observed with heterosexual patients in Washington State most likely (35.5%), and those in New York City, Connecticut, and Philadelphia least likely to report receiving EPT (<2%).

conclusionsWith the exception of one jurisdiction in the STD Surveillance Network actively promoting EPT use, patient-reported receipt of the intervention remains suboptimal across the network. Additional efforts to promote EPT, especially for patients diagnosed in private provider and hospital settings, are needed to realize the full potential of this valuable gonorrhea control intervention.

Indexed as

Sexual PartnersAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overContact TracingEpidemiological MonitoringFemaleGonorrheaHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedSelf ReportSexually Transmitted DiseasesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID26267871
PMCPMC6902052
OpenAlexW2439804289

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.