Evidence mapPaperPMID 26328952Full record

ArticleMedical physics2015

Automated pericardium delineation and epicardial fat volume quantification from noncontrast CT.

Xiaowei Ding, Demetri Terzopoulos, Mariana Diaz-Zamudio, Daniel S Berman, Piotr J Slomka, Damini Dey

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06557811 (Effect of Oral Semaglutide on Epicardial and Pericoronary Adipose Tissues in Type 2 Diabetes After Myocardial Infarction), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06557811 phase4not yet recruitingstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Oral Semaglutide on Epicardial and Pericoronary Adipose Tissues in Type 2 Diabetes After Myocardial Infarction: a Randomized and Double-blind Clinical Trial

Ran2024Enrolled88Registered outcomes26Posted comparisons0ConditionsAcute Myocardial Infarction, Diabetic PatientsArmssemaglutide
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiaowei DingBiomedical Imaging Research Institute, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California 90048 and Computer Science Department, Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science at UCLA, Los Angeles, California 90095.
Demetri TerzopoulosComputer Science Department, Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science at UCLA, Los Angeles, California 90095.
Mariana Diaz-ZamudioNuclear Medicine Department, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California 90048.
Daniel S BermanDepartments of Imaging and Medicine, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California 90048 and Department of Medicine, David-Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California 90095.
Piotr J SlomkaDepartments of Imaging and Medicine, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California 90048 and Department of Medicine, David-Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California 90095.
Damini DeyBiomedical Imaging Research Institute, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California 90048 and Department of Medicine, David-Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California 90095.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe authors aimed to develop and validate an automated algorithm for epicardial fat volume (EFV) quantification from noncontrast CT.

methodsThe authors developed a hybrid algorithm based on initial segmentation with a multiple-patient CT atlas, followed by automated pericardium delineation using geodesic active contours. A coregistered segmented CT atlas was created from manually segmented CT data and stored offline. The heart and pericardium in test CT data are first initialized by image registration to the CT atlas. The pericardium is then detected by a knowledge-based algorithm, which extracts only the membrane representing the pericardium. From its initial atlas position, the pericardium is modeled by geodesic active contours, which iteratively deform and lock onto the detected pericardium. EFV is automatically computed using standard fat attenuation range.

resultsThe authors applied their algorithm on 50 patients undergoing routine coronary calcium assessment by CT. Measurement time was 60 s per-patient. EFV quantified by the algorithm (83.60 ± 32.89 cm(3)) and expert readers (81.85 ± 34.28 cm(3)) showed excellent correlation (r = 0.97, p < 0.0001), with no significant differences by comparison of individual data points (p = 0.15). Voxel overlap by Dice coefficient between the algorithm and expert readers was 0.92 (range 0.88-0.95). The mean surface distance and Hausdorff distance in millimeter between manually drawn contours and the automatically obtained contours were 0.6 ± 0.9 mm and 3.9 ± 1.7 mm, respectively. Mean difference between the algorithm and experts was 9.7% ± 7.4%, similar to interobserver variability between 2 readers (8.0% ± 5.3%, p = 0.3).

conclusionsThe authors' novel automated method based on atlas-initialized active contours accurately and rapidly quantifies EFV from noncontrast CT.

Indexed as

Tomography, X-Ray ComputedAdipose TissueAlgorithmsAutomationHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPericardium

Identifiers

PMID26328952

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.