ArticleMedical physics2015
Automated pericardium delineation and epicardial fat volume quantification from noncontrast CT.
Article in Medical physics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06557811 (Effect of Oral Semaglutide on Epicardial and Pericoronary Adipose Tissues in Type 2 Diabetes After Myocardial Infarction), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Oral Semaglutide on Epicardial and Pericoronary Adipose Tissues in Type 2 Diabetes After Myocardial Infarction: a Randomized and Double-blind Clinical Trial
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Role of Echocardiography in the Assessment of Epicardial Adipose Tissue: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Current obesity reports · 2026Pooled it
- Automated Segmentation of Tissues Using CT and MRI: A Systematic Review.Academic radiology · 2019Pooled it
- Feasibility of Artificial Intelligence Models for Longitudinal CT Analysis of Epicardial Adipose Tissue After Immunotherapy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based quantification of epicardial adipose tissue volume from non-contrast computed tomography images: a multi-centre study.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
- Epicardial Adipose Tissue: A Multimodal Imaging Diagnostic Perspective.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Imaging biomarkers in cardiac CT: moving beyond simple coronary anatomical assessment.La Radiologia medica · 2024Review
- Review
- Quantification of Epicardial Adipose Tissue Volume and Attenuation for Cardiac CT Scans Using Deep Learning in a Single Multi-Task Framework.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Quantitative plaque characterisation and association with acute coronary syndrome on medium to long term follow up: insights from computed tomography coronary angiography.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2022Article
- Cut-off point of CT-assessed epicardial adipose tissue volume for predicting worse clinical burden of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia.Emergency radiology · 2022Article
- Article
- Cardiac CT angiography in current practice: An American society for preventive cardiology clinical practice statementAmerican journal of preventive cardiology · 2022Article
- Artificial intelligence based automatic quantification of epicardial adipose tissue suitable for large scale population studies.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Cardiac Computed Tomography Radiomics for the Non-Invasive Assessment of Coronary Inflammation.Cells · 2021Review
- Artificial Intelligence Based Multimodality Imaging: A New Frontier in Coronary Artery Disease Management.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
- Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 and Osteopontin Gene Expression in Epicardial Adipose Tissue from Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Is Associated with the Presence of Calcified Atherosclerotic Plaques.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2020Article
- Fully Automated CT Quantification of Epicardial Adipose Tissue by Deep Learning: A Multicenter Study.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2019Article
- Perivascular Adipose Tissue and Coronary Atherosclerosis: from Biology to Imaging Phenotyping.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2019Review
- Deep Learning for Quantification of Epicardial and Thoracic Adipose Tissue From Non-Contrast CT.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2018Article
- Automatic pericardium segmentation and quantification of epicardial fat from computed tomography angiography.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe authors aimed to develop and validate an automated algorithm for epicardial fat volume (EFV) quantification from noncontrast CT.
methodsThe authors developed a hybrid algorithm based on initial segmentation with a multiple-patient CT atlas, followed by automated pericardium delineation using geodesic active contours. A coregistered segmented CT atlas was created from manually segmented CT data and stored offline. The heart and pericardium in test CT data are first initialized by image registration to the CT atlas. The pericardium is then detected by a knowledge-based algorithm, which extracts only the membrane representing the pericardium. From its initial atlas position, the pericardium is modeled by geodesic active contours, which iteratively deform and lock onto the detected pericardium. EFV is automatically computed using standard fat attenuation range.
resultsThe authors applied their algorithm on 50 patients undergoing routine coronary calcium assessment by CT. Measurement time was 60 s per-patient. EFV quantified by the algorithm (83.60 ± 32.89 cm(3)) and expert readers (81.85 ± 34.28 cm(3)) showed excellent correlation (r = 0.97, p < 0.0001), with no significant differences by comparison of individual data points (p = 0.15). Voxel overlap by Dice coefficient between the algorithm and expert readers was 0.92 (range 0.88-0.95). The mean surface distance and Hausdorff distance in millimeter between manually drawn contours and the automatically obtained contours were 0.6 ± 0.9 mm and 3.9 ± 1.7 mm, respectively. Mean difference between the algorithm and experts was 9.7% ± 7.4%, similar to interobserver variability between 2 readers (8.0% ± 5.3%, p = 0.3).
conclusionsThe authors' novel automated method based on atlas-initialized active contours accurately and rapidly quantifies EFV from noncontrast CT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26328952What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.