ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Renal physiology2015
Do ASARM peptides play a role in nephrogenic systemic fibrosis?
Article in American journal of physiology. Renal physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fluorinated hydrogel nanoparticles with regulable fluorine contents andRSC advances · 2023Article
- Kidney stone formation in a novel murine model of polycystic kidney disease.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2022Article
- Biological effects of MRI contrast agents: gadolinium retention, potential mechanisms and a role for phosphorus.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2017Review
- Moderate Renal Failure Accentuates T1 Signal Enhancement in the Deep Cerebellar Nuclei of Gadodiamide-Treated Rats.Investigative radiology · 2017Article
- Comprehensive phenotyping of cutaneous afferents reveals early-onset alterations in nociceptor response properties, release of CGRP, and hindpaw edema following spinal cord injury.Neurobiology of pain (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) is a devastating condition associated with gadolinium (Gd3+)-based contrast agents (GBCAs) in patients with kidney disease. The release of toxic Gd3+ from GBCAs likely plays a major role in NSF pathophysiology. The cause and etiology of Gd3+ release from GBCAs is unknown. Increased Acidic Serine Aspartate Rich MEPE-associated peptides (ASARM peptides) induce bone mineralization abnormalities and contribute to renal phosphate-handling defects in inherited hypophosphatemic rickets and tumor-induced osteomalacia. The proteolytic cleavage of related bone matrix proteins with ASARM motifs results in release of ASARM peptide into bone and circulation. ASARM peptides are acidic, reactive, phosphorylated inhibitors of mineralization that bind Ca2+ and hydroxyapatite. Since the ionic radius of Gd3+ is close to that of Ca2+, we hypothesized that ASARM peptides increase the risk of NSF by inducing release of Gd3+ from GBCAs. Here, we show 1) ASARM peptides bind and induce release of Gd3+ from GBCAs in vitro and in vivo; 2) A bioengineered peptide (SPR4) stabilizes the Gd3+-GBCA complex by specifically binding to ASARM peptide in vitro and in vivo; and 3) SPR4 peptide infusion prevents GBCA-induced NSF-like pathology in a murine model with increased ASARM peptide (Hyp mouse). We conclude ASARM peptides may play a role in NSF and SPR4 peptide is a candidate adjuvant for preventing or reducing risk of disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.