Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26365102›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of obesity (2005)2016

Does low-energy sweetener consumption affect energy intake and body weight? A systematic review, including meta-analyses, of the evidence from human and animal studies.

P J Rogers, P S Hogenkamp, C de Graaf, S Higgs, A Lluch, A R Ness, C Penfold, R Perry, P Putz, M R Yeomans and 1 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of obesity (2005), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 145 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
145citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
40.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04245826 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Changing or Substituting Low-calorie Sweetened Beverages for Sugar-Sweetened Beverages or Water and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of TorontoRan2019 to 2020Enrolled1ConditionsAdiposity, Metabolic Syndrome, Type 2 Diabetes, Cardiovascular DiseasesArmsChange in LCSBs Intake, Substitute LCSBs for SSBs or Water
NCT04904133 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Regular Consumption of Low/No Calorie Sweeteners on Glycemic Response and Glucagon Like Peptide-1 Secretion in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAcibadem UniversityRan2019 to 2019Enrolled42ConditionsHealthy Population, Glucose ToleranceArmsLow/No Calorie Sweeteners, Placebo Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

145 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 343 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Guideline
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

85 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

P J RogersSchool of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
P S HogenkampDepartment of Neuroscience, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
C de GraafDivision of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
S HiggsThe School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
A LluchDanone Research, Centre Daniel Carasso, RD, Palaiseau Cedex, France.
A R NessNational Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Unit in Nutrition, Diet and Lifestyle at the University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol and School of Oral and Dental Sciences, University of Bristol, Level 3, University Hospitals Bristol Education Centre, Bristol, UK.
C PenfoldNational Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Unit in Nutrition, Diet and Lifestyle at the University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol and School of Oral and Dental Sciences, University of Bristol, Level 3, University Hospitals Bristol Education Centre, Bristol, UK.
R PerryNational Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Unit in Nutrition, Diet and Lifestyle at the University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol and School of Oral and Dental Sciences, University of Bristol, Level 3, University Hospitals Bristol Education Centre, Bristol, UK.
P PutzEuropean Branch, ILSI Europe a.i.s.b.l., Brussels, Belgium.
M R YeomansSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
D J MelaUnilever R&D Vlaardingen, Vlaardingen, the Netherlands.
National Institute for Health Research · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBDanone (France) · FRInternational Life Sciences Institute Europe · BEUnilever (Netherlands) · NLUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Sussex · GBUppsala University · SEWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By reducing energy density, low-energy sweeteners (LES) might be expected to reduce energy intake (EI) and body weight (BW). To assess the totality of the evidence testing the null hypothesis that LES exposure (versus sugars or unsweetened alternatives) has no effect on EI or BW, we conducted a systematic review of relevant studies in animals and humans consuming LES with ad libitum access to food energy. In 62 of 90 animal studies exposure to LES did not affect or decreased BW. Of 28 reporting increased BW, 19 compared LES with glucose exposure using a specific 'learning' paradigm. Twelve prospective cohort studies in humans reported inconsistent associations between LES use and body mass index (-0.002 kg m(-)(2) per year, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.009 to 0.005). Meta-analysis of short-term randomized controlled trials (129 comparisons) showed reduced total EI for LES versus sugar-sweetened food or beverage consumption before an ad libitum meal (-94 kcal, 95% CI -122 to -66), with no difference versus water (-2 kcal, 95% CI -30 to 26). This was consistent with EI results from sustained intervention randomized controlled trials (10 comparisons). Meta-analysis of sustained intervention randomized controlled trials (4 weeks to 40 months) showed that consumption of LES versus sugar led to relatively reduced BW (nine comparisons; -1.35 kg, 95% CI -2.28 to -0.42), and a similar relative reduction in BW versus water (three comparisons; -1.24 kg, 95% CI -2.22 to -0.26). Most animal studies did not mimic LES consumption by humans, and reverse causation may influence the results of prospective cohort studies. The preponderance of evidence from all human randomized controlled trials indicates that LES do not increase EI or BW, whether compared with caloric or non-caloric (for example, water) control conditions. Overall, the balance of evidence indicates that use of LES in place of sugar, in children and adults, leads to reduced EI and BW, and possibly also when compared with water.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexWeight GainAnimalsBody WeightEnergy IntakeEvidence-Based MedicineHumansModels, AnimalNon-Nutritive SweetenersObesityObservational Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReproducibility of ResultsSweetening AgentsNon-Nutritive SweetenersSweetening Agents

Identifiers

PMID26365102
PMCPMC4786736
OpenAlexW2171131656

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.