Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26501536›Full record

GuidelineJAMA2015

Breast Cancer Screening for Women at Average Risk: 2015 Guideline Update From the American Cancer Society.

Kevin C Oeffinger, Elizabeth T H Fontham, Ruth Etzioni, Abbe Herzig, James S Michaelson, Ya-Chen Tina Shih, Louise C Walter, Timothy R Church, Christopher R Flowers, Samuel J LaMonte and 10 more

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in JAMA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 736 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
736citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
72.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02719795 early_phase1unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Pectoral Nerves Blocks and Their Effect on Chronic Pain After Breast Cancer Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorFirst Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong UniversityRan2016 to 2019Enrolled140ConditionsBreast NeoplasmsArmsRopivacaine, Normal saline
NCT05858242 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Early Auxiliary Diagnosis and Postoperative Recurrence Monitoring of Breast Cancer Based on Plasma ctDNA Methylation Markers

TypeobservationalSponsorSinglera Genomics Inc.Ran2023 to 2026Enrolled100ConditionsBreast Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

736 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,629 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Guideline
  9. Does Messaging for Reducing Breast Cancer Overscreening in Older Women Have Differential Responses among Medical Minimizers and Maximizers?Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2026
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

676 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin C OeffingerMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Elizabeth T H FonthamLouisiana State University School of Public Health, New Orleans.
Ruth EtzioniUniversity of Washington and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle.
Abbe HerzigPatient advocate, Troy, New York.
James S MichaelsonMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Ya-Chen Tina ShihUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Louise C WalterUniversity of California, San Francisco, and San Francisco VA Medical Center.
Timothy R ChurchMasonic Cancer Center and the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Christopher R FlowersEmory University School of Medicine and Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia.
Samuel J LaMonteIndependent retired physician and patient advocate.
Andrew M D WolfUniversity of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville.
Carol DeSantisAmerican Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia.
Joannie Lortet-TieulentAmerican Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia.
Kimberly AndrewsAmerican Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia.
Deana Manassaram-BaptisteAmerican Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia.
Debbie SaslowAmerican Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia.
Robert A SmithAmerican Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia.
Otis W BrawleyAmerican Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia.
Richard WenderAmerican Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia.
American Cancer Society
American Cancer Society · USPatient Advocate Foundation · USEmory University · USLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USSan Francisco VA Medical Center · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Virginia · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Midcareer Mentoring Award for Patient-Oriented Research in AgingK24AG041180 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI WALTER, LOUISE C. · 2011 to 2016
$909k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIA NIH HHS K24 AG041180
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceBreast cancer is a leading cause of premature mortality among US women. Early detection has been shown to be associated with reduced breast cancer morbidity and mortality.

objectiveTo update the American Cancer Society (ACS) 2003 breast cancer screening guideline for women at average risk for breast cancer. PROCESS: The ACS commissioned a systematic evidence review of the breast cancer screening literature to inform the update and a supplemental analysis of mammography registry data to address questions related to the screening interval. Formulation of recommendations was based on the quality of the evidence and judgment (incorporating values and preferences) about the balance of benefits and harms. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Screening mammography in women aged 40 to 69 years is associated with a reduction in breast cancer deaths across a range of study designs, and inferential evidence supports breast cancer screening for women 70 years and older who are in good health. Estimates of the cumulative lifetime risk of false-positive examination results are greater if screening begins at younger ages because of the greater number of mammograms, as well as the higher recall rate in younger women. The quality of the evidence for overdiagnosis is not sufficient to estimate a lifetime risk with confidence. Analysis examining the screening interval demonstrates more favorable tumor characteristics when premenopausal women are screened annually vs biennially. Evidence does not support routine clinical breast examination as a screening method for women at average risk. RECOMMENDATIONS: The ACS recommends that women with an average risk of breast cancer should undergo regular screening mammography starting at age 45 years (strong recommendation). Women aged 45 to 54 years should be screened annually (qualified recommendation). Women 55 years and older should transition to biennial screening or have the opportunity to continue screening annually (qualified recommendation). Women should have the opportunity to begin annual screening between the ages of 40 and 44 years (qualified recommendation). Women should continue screening mammography as long as their overall health is good and they have a life expectancy of 10 years or longer (qualified recommendation). The ACS does not recommend clinical breast examination for breast cancer screening among average-risk women at any age (qualified recommendation). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These updated ACS guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for breast cancer screening for women at average risk of breast cancer. These recommendations should be considered by physicians and women in discussions about breast cancer screening.

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHealth StatusHumansLife ExpectancyMammographyMiddle AgedReview Literature as TopicRiskUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID26501536
PMCPMC4831582
OpenAlexW2155329254

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.