GuidelineJAMA2015
Breast Cancer Screening for Women at Average Risk: 2015 Guideline Update From the American Cancer Society.
Guideline in JAMA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 736 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Pectoral Nerves Blocks and Their Effect on Chronic Pain After Breast Cancer Surgery
Early Auxiliary Diagnosis and Postoperative Recurrence Monitoring of Breast Cancer Based on Plasma ctDNA Methylation Markers
Who cites it
736 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,629 citations in OpenAlex.
- Toward noninvasive precision: a meta-analysis of photoacoustic spectroscopy in breast cancer.Lasers in medical science · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of Online Interactive Decision Tools on Women's Decision-Making Regarding Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Screening for breast cancer: a systematic review update to inform the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care guideline.Systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Geriatric Breast Cancer: Staging, Molecular Surrogates, and Treatment. A Review & Meta-analysis.Aging and disease · 2024Pooled it
- Shared decision-making for supporting women's decisions about breast cancer screening.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Repeated measures of mammographic density and texture to evaluate prediction and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review of the methods used in the literature.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2023Pooled it
- Clinicopathologic Features of Breast Cancer in Egypt-Contemporary Profile and Future Needs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JCO global oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Guidelines for breast cancer management in Bosnia and Herzegovina.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2023Guideline
- Does Messaging for Reducing Breast Cancer Overscreening in Older Women Have Differential Responses among Medical Minimizers and Maximizers?Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2026Trial
- Supporting informed decisions about breast cancer screening in communities with known environmental contamination: a pre-post study.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2025Trial
- The Impact of Nurse-Led Intervention on Breast Cancer Screening and Early Detection in China: Randomized Control Trial.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Trial
- The effect of conflicting versus consistent messaging on older women's support for breast cancer screening cessation.Patient education and counseling · 2025Trial
- Effectiveness of Breast Density Educational Interventions on Mammography Screening Adherence Among Underserved Latinas: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Effect of Messaging on Support for Breast Cancer Screening Cessation Among Older US Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- When should electronic medical records reminders for cancer screening stop?-Results from a national physician survey.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2023Trial
- Temporal trajectories of age at breast cancer diagnosis by socioeconomic and geographic factors: a 1975-2021 SEER analysis.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2026Article
- Cost-effectiveness of organised versus opportunistic mammography breast cancer screening in low-resourced country.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Association of Pre-Diagnosis Breast Assessment Practices and Risk Factors with Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Healthcare Utilization and Inequalities in Breast Cancer Early Detection Behaviors Among Women in Türkiye: A Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
676 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
20 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
importanceBreast cancer is a leading cause of premature mortality among US women. Early detection has been shown to be associated with reduced breast cancer morbidity and mortality.
objectiveTo update the American Cancer Society (ACS) 2003 breast cancer screening guideline for women at average risk for breast cancer. PROCESS: The ACS commissioned a systematic evidence review of the breast cancer screening literature to inform the update and a supplemental analysis of mammography registry data to address questions related to the screening interval. Formulation of recommendations was based on the quality of the evidence and judgment (incorporating values and preferences) about the balance of benefits and harms. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Screening mammography in women aged 40 to 69 years is associated with a reduction in breast cancer deaths across a range of study designs, and inferential evidence supports breast cancer screening for women 70 years and older who are in good health. Estimates of the cumulative lifetime risk of false-positive examination results are greater if screening begins at younger ages because of the greater number of mammograms, as well as the higher recall rate in younger women. The quality of the evidence for overdiagnosis is not sufficient to estimate a lifetime risk with confidence. Analysis examining the screening interval demonstrates more favorable tumor characteristics when premenopausal women are screened annually vs biennially. Evidence does not support routine clinical breast examination as a screening method for women at average risk. RECOMMENDATIONS: The ACS recommends that women with an average risk of breast cancer should undergo regular screening mammography starting at age 45 years (strong recommendation). Women aged 45 to 54 years should be screened annually (qualified recommendation). Women 55 years and older should transition to biennial screening or have the opportunity to continue screening annually (qualified recommendation). Women should have the opportunity to begin annual screening between the ages of 40 and 44 years (qualified recommendation). Women should continue screening mammography as long as their overall health is good and they have a life expectancy of 10 years or longer (qualified recommendation). The ACS does not recommend clinical breast examination for breast cancer screening among average-risk women at any age (qualified recommendation). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These updated ACS guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for breast cancer screening for women at average risk of breast cancer. These recommendations should be considered by physicians and women in discussions about breast cancer screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.