Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26546108›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine2015

Burden of type 2 diabetes in Mexico: past, current and future prevalence and incidence rates.

Rafael Meza, Tonatiuh Barrientos-Gutierrez, Rosalba Rojas-Martinez, Nancy Reynoso-Noverón, Lina Sofia Palacio-Mejia, Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce, Mauricio Hernández-Ávila

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Archives of medical science : AMS · 2022
    Article
  19. An Article in Two Parts: My Dinners With RichardDiabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rafael MezaDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA. Electronic address: rmeza@umich.edu.
Tonatiuh Barrientos-GutierrezCenter for Population Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos Mexico.
Rosalba Rojas-MartinezCenter for Population Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos Mexico.
Nancy Reynoso-NoverónDivision of Research, National Cancer Institute, Mexico City, Mexico.
Lina Sofia Palacio-MejiaNational Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos Mexico.
Eduardo Lazcano-PonceCenter for Population Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos Mexico.
Mauricio Hernández-ÁvilaNational Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos Mexico.

Funding

Research BaseP30DK092926 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MARY ELLEN MICHELE HEISLER, ADESUWA B OLOMU · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092926NIDDK NIH HHS P30DK092926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMexico diabetes prevalence has increased dramatically in recent years. However, no national incidence estimates exist, hampering the assessment of diabetes trends and precluding the development of burden of disease analyses to inform public health policy decision-making. Here we provide evidence regarding current magnitude of diabetes in Mexico and its future trends.

methodsWe used data from the Mexico National Health and Nutrition Survey, and age-period-cohort models to estimate prevalence and incidence of self-reported diagnosed diabetes by age, sex, calendar-year (1960-2012), and birth-cohort (1920-1980). We project future rates under three alternative incidence scenarios using demographic projections of the Mexican population from 2010-2050 and a Multi-cohort Diabetes Markov Model.

resultsAdult (ages 20+) diagnosed diabetes prevalence in Mexico increased from 7% to 8.9% from 2006 to 2012. Diabetes prevalence increases with age, peaking around ages 65-68 to then decrease. Age-specific incidence follows similar patterns, but peaks around ages 57-59. We estimate that diagnosed diabetes incidence increased exponentially during 1960-2012, roughly doubling every 10 years. Projected rates under three age-specific incidence scenarios suggest diabetes prevalence among adults (ages 20+) may reach 13.7-22.5% by 2050, affecting 15-25 million individuals, with a lifetime risk of 1 in 3 to 1 in 2.

conclusionsDiabetes prevalence in Mexico will continue to increase even if current incidence rates remain unchanged. Continued implementation of policies to reduce obesity rates, increase physical activity, and improve population diet, in tandem with diabetes surveillance and other risk control measures is paramount to substantially reduce the burden of diabetes in Mexico.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleForecastingHumansIncidenceMaleMarkov ChainsMexicoMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalNutrition SurveysObesityPopulation GrowthPrevalenceAge-period-cohort modelsAge-specific diabetes incidenceDiabetes incidence and prevalenceDiabetes projectionsMarkov simulation models

Identifiers

PMID26546108
PMCPMC4679631

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.