Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26562020›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

SNPase-ARMS qPCR: Ultrasensitive Mutation-Based Detection of Cell-Free Tumor DNA in Melanoma Patients.

Julia Stadler, Johanna Eder, Barbara Pratscher, Sabine Brandt, Doris Schneller, Robert Müllegger, Claus Vogl, Franz Trautinger, Gottfried Brem, Joerg P Burgstaller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Using cfDNA and ctDNA as Oncologic Markers: A Path to Clinical Validation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. [The role of circulating tumor DNA in the diagnosis and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Julia StadlerBiotechnology in Animal Production, Department for Agrobiotechnology, IFA Tulln, Tulln, Lower Austria, Austria.
Johanna EderDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, St. Poelten, Lower Austria, Austria.
Barbara PratscherResearch Group Oncology of the Equine Clinic, Department for Companion Animal and Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Sabine BrandtResearch Group Oncology of the Equine Clinic, Department for Companion Animal and Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Doris SchnellerBiotechnology in Animal Production, Department for Agrobiotechnology, IFA Tulln, Tulln, Lower Austria, Austria.
Robert MülleggerDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Landesklinikum Wiener Neustadt, Wiener Neustadt, Lower Austria, Austria.
Claus VoglInstitute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Franz TrautingerDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, St. Poelten, Lower Austria, Austria.
Gottfried BremBiotechnology in Animal Production, Department for Agrobiotechnology, IFA Tulln, Tulln, Lower Austria, Austria.
Joerg P BurgstallerBiotechnology in Animal Production, Department for Agrobiotechnology, IFA Tulln, Tulln, Lower Austria, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-free circulating tumor DNA in the plasma of cancer patients has become a common point of interest as indicator of therapy options and treatment response in clinical cancer research. Especially patient- and tumor-specific single nucleotide variants that accurately distinguish tumor DNA from wild type DNA are promising targets. The reliable detection and quantification of these single-base DNA variants is technically challenging. Currently, a variety of techniques is applied, with no apparent "gold standard". Here we present a novel qPCR protocol that meets the conditions of extreme sensitivity and specificity that are required for detection and quantification of tumor DNA. By consecutive application of two polymerases, one of them designed for extreme base-specificity, the method reaches unprecedented sensitivity and specificity. Three qPCR assays were tested with spike-in experiments, specific for point mutations BRAF V600E, PTEN T167A and NRAS Q61L of melanoma cell lines. It was possible to detect down to one copy of tumor DNA per reaction (Poisson distribution), at a background of up to 200 000 wild type DNAs. To prove its clinical applicability, the method was successfully tested on a small cohort of BRAF V600E positive melanoma patients.

Indexed as

MutationCell Line, TumorCohort StudiesDNA Copy Number VariationsDNA Mutational AnalysisDNA, NeoplasmGTP PhosphohydrolasesHumansMelanomaMembrane ProteinsNeoplasm StagingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafPTEN PhosphohydrolaseReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsDNA, NeoplasmGTP PhosphohydrolasesMembrane ProteinsNRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafPTEN PhosphohydrolasePTEN protein, human

Identifiers

PMID26562020
PMCPMC4642939

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.