Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26598601›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology2016

p53 Restoration in Induction and Maintenance of Senescence: Differential Effects in Premalignant and Malignant Tumor Cells.

Mohamad Harajly, Hasan Zalzali, Zafar Nawaz, Sandra E Ghayad, Farah Ghamloush, Hussein Basma, Samiha Zainedin, Wissam Rabeh, Mark Jabbour, Ayman Tawil and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Paradoxical Role of Cellular Senescence in Cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Mohamad HarajlyDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Hasan ZalzaliDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Zafar NawazCytogenetics and Molecular Cytogenetic Laboratory, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar.
Sandra E GhayadDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Farah GhamloushDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Hussein BasmaDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Samiha ZainedinCytogenetics and Molecular Cytogenetic Laboratory, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar.
Wissam RabehDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Mark JabbourDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Ayman TawilDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Danielle A BadroDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Gerard I EvanDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Raya SaabDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon rs88@aub.edu.lb.
American University of Beirut Medical Center · LBHamad General Hospital · QAUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 12077Cancer Research UK 19013Cancer Research UK 22585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The restoration of p53 has been suggested as a therapeutic approach in tumors. However, the timing of p53 restoration in relation to its efficacy during tumor progression still is unclear. We now show that the restoration of p53 in murine premalignant proliferating pineal lesions resulted in cellular senescence, while p53 restoration in invasive pineal tumors did not. The effectiveness of p53 restoration was not dependent on p19(Arf) expression but showed an inverse correlation with Mdm2 expression. In tumor cells, p53 restoration became effective when paired with either DNA-damaging therapy or with nutlin, an inhibitor of p53-Mdm2 interaction. Interestingly, the inactivation of p53 after senescence resulted in reentry into the cell cycle and rapid tumor progression. The evaluation of a panel of human supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumors (sPNET) showed low activity of the p53 pathway. Together, these data suggest that the restoration of the p53 pathway has different effects in premalignant versus invasive pineal tumors, and that p53 activation needs to be continually sustained, as reversion from senescence occurs rapidly with aggressive tumor growth when p53 is lost again. Finally, p53 restoration approaches may be worth exploring in sPNET, where the p53 gene is intact but the pathway is inactive in the majority of examined tumors.

Indexed as

Cellular SenescenceAnimalsBrain NeoplasmsCell ProliferationGene DeletionGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicNeoplasm InvasivenessNeuroectodermal Tumors, PrimitivePineal GlandPinealomaProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2Tumor Suppressor Protein p53MDM2 protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID26598601
PMCPMC4719431
OpenAlexW2179994588

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.