Evidence mapPaperPMID 26626607Full record

ArticleCurrent obesity reports2014

The BMI: Is It Time to Scratch for a More Accurate Assessment of Metabolic Dysfunction?

E Charles Moore, Walter J Pories

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current obesity reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

E Charles MooreDepartment of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, 600 Moye Blvd, Brody Medical Science 4W-48, Mail Stop 639, Greenville, NC, 27858, USA.
Walter J PoriesDepartment of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, 600 Moye Blvd, Brody Medical Science 4W-48, Mail Stop 639, Greenville, NC, 27858, USA. pories@aol.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The body mass index (BMI = Kg/M(2)) is not a valid measure for clinical decisions, especially whether a patient will benefit from bariatric surgery. The measure, as used, discriminates against the muscular, the aged, women, and racial groups such as Asians and African Americans. The requirement must be eliminated since it denies many patients the only currently available therapy. This chapter provides the bibliographic data to support this argument and should prove useful in convincing carriers that the BMI is an inaccurate and, too often, cruel guideline.

Indexed as

Bariatric surgeryBMIMetabolic syndromeObesity

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.