Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26627005›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015

PC-TraFF: identification of potentially collaborating transcription factors using pointwise mutual information.

Cornelia Meckbach, Rebecca Tacke, Xu Hua, Stephan Waack, Edgar Wingender, Mehmet Gültas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. TF-COMB - Discovering grammar of transcription factor binding sites.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Article
  6. NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cornelia MeckbachInstitute of Bioinformatics, University of Göttingen, Goldschmidtstr. 1, Göttingen, 37077, Germany. cornelia.meckbach@bioinf.med.uni-goettingen.de.
Rebecca TackeInstitute of Bioinformatics, University of Göttingen, Goldschmidtstr. 1, Göttingen, 37077, Germany. rebecca.tacke@stud.uni-goettingen.de.
Xu HuaInstitute of Bioinformatics, University of Göttingen, Goldschmidtstr. 1, Göttingen, 37077, Germany. xu.hua@bioinf.med.uni-goettingen.de.
Stephan WaackInstitute of Computer Science, University of Göttingen, Goldschmidtstr. 7, Göttingen, 37077, Germany. waack@cs.uni-goettingen.de.
Edgar WingenderInstitute of Bioinformatics, University of Göttingen, Goldschmidtstr. 1, Göttingen, 37077, Germany. edgar.wingender@bioinf.med.uni-goettingen.de.
Mehmet GültasInstitute of Bioinformatics, University of Göttingen, Goldschmidtstr. 1, Göttingen, 37077, Germany. mehmet.gueltas@bioinf.med.uni-goettingen.de.
University of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranscription factors (TFs) are important regulatory proteins that govern transcriptional regulation. Today, it is known that in higher organisms different TFs have to cooperate rather than acting individually in order to control complex genetic programs. The identification of these interactions is an important challenge for understanding the molecular mechanisms of regulating biological processes. In this study, we present a new method based on pointwise mutual information, PC-TraFF, which considers the genome as a document, the sequences as sentences, and TF binding sites (TFBSs) as words to identify interacting TFs in a set of sequences.

resultsTo demonstrate the effectiveness of PC-TraFF, we performed a genome-wide analysis and a breast cancer-associated sequence set analysis for protein coding and miRNA genes. Our results show that in any of these sequence sets, PC-TraFF is able to identify important interacting TF pairs, for most of which we found support by previously published experimental results. Further, we made a pairwise comparison between PC-TraFF and three conventional methods. The outcome of this comparison study strongly suggests that all these methods focus on different important aspects of interaction between TFs and thus the pairwise overlap between any of them is only marginal.

conclusionsIn this study, adopting the idea from the field of linguistics in the field of bioinformatics, we develop a new information theoretic method, PC-TraFF, for the identification of potentially collaborating transcription factors based on the idiosyncrasy of their binding site distributions on the genome. The results of our study show that PC-TraFF can succesfully identify known interacting TF pairs and thus its currently biologically uncorfirmed predictions could provide new hypotheses for further experimental validation. Additionally, the comparison of the results of PC-TraFF with the results of previous methods demonstrates that different methods with their specific scopes can perfectly supplement each other. Overall, our analyses indicate that PC-TraFF is a time-efficient method where its algorithm has a tractable computational time and memory consumption. The PC-TraFF server is freely accessible at http://pctraff.bioinf.med.uni-goettingen.de/.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenome, HumanBinding SitesBreast NeoplasmsComputational BiologyFemaleHumansMicroRNAsPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein BindingTranscription FactorsMicroRNAsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID26627005
PMCPMC4667426
OpenAlexW2184124585

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.