Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26627194›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2015

"Salivary gland cellular architecture in the Asian malaria vector mosquito Anopheles stephensi".

Michael B Wells, Deborah J Andrew

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. eLife · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. A single-nucleus transcriptomic atlas of the adultbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. mBio · 2019
    Article
  10. Tick Paralysis: Solving an Enigma.Veterinary sciences · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael B WellsDepartment of Cell Biology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 725 N. Wolfe St., G-10 Hunterian, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. mwells24@jhmi.edu.
Deborah J AndrewDepartment of Cell Biology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 725 N. Wolfe St., G-10 Hunterian, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. dandrew@jhmi.edu.
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

FORMATION OF THE DROSOPHILA SALIVARY GLANDR01DE013899 · NIDCR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Deborah J Andrew · 2001 to 2026
$11.2M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE013899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnopheles mosquitoes are vectors for malaria, a disease with continued grave outcomes for human health. Transmission of malaria from mosquitoes to humans occurs by parasite passage through the salivary glands (SGs). Previous studies of mosquito SG architecture have been limited in scope and detail.

methodsWe developed a simple, optimized protocol for fluorescence staining using dyes and/or antibodies to interrogate cellular architecture in Anopheles stephensi adult SGs. We used common biological dyes, antibodies to well-conserved structural and organellar markers, and antibodies against Anopheles salivary proteins to visualize many individual SGs at high resolution by confocal microscopy.

resultsThese analyses confirmed morphological features previously described using electron microscopy and uncovered a high degree of individual variation in SG structure. Our studies provide evidence for two alternative models for the origin of the salivary duct, the structure facilitating parasite transport out of SGs. We compare SG cellular architecture in An. stephensi and Drosophila melanogaster, a fellow Dipteran whose adult SGs are nearly completely unstudied, and find many conserved features despite divergence in overall form and function. Anopheles salivary proteins previously observed at the basement membrane were localized either in SG cells, secretory cavities, or the SG lumen. Our studies also revealed a population of cells with characteristics consistent with regenerative cells, similar to muscle satellite cells or midgut regenerative cells.

conclusionsThis work serves as a foundation for linking Anopheles stephensi SG cellular architecture to function and as a basis for generating and evaluating tools aimed at preventing malaria transmission at the level of mosquito SGs.

Indexed as

Insect VectorsAnimalsAnophelesAsiaDrosophila melanogasterMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, FluorescenceSalivary GlandsSalivary Proteins and PeptidesSalivary Proteins and Peptides

Identifiers

PMID26627194
PMCPMC4667400
OpenAlexW2188343147

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.