ReviewClinical science (London, England : 1979)2016
The natriuretic peptides system in the pathophysiology of heart failure: from molecular basis to treatment.
Review in Clinical science (London, England : 1979), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
125 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 295 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accuracy of NT-proBNP for predicting mortality amongst patients with ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluating biomarkers for contrast-induced nephropathy following coronary interventions: an umbrella review on meta-analyses.European journal of medical research · 2024Pooled it
- Molecular biomarkers predicting newly detected atrial fibrillation after ischaemic stroke or TIA: A systematic review.European stroke journal · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of sacubitril-valsartan in the treatment of ventricular remodeling in patients with heart failure after acute myocardial infarction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Amlodipine in Japanese Patients With Essential Hypertension: A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label, Noninferiority Study (PARASOL Study).Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Trial
- Association Between Plasma Brain Natriuretic Peptide and Overall Survival in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Preliminary Findings.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2019Trial
- Use of Natriuretic Peptides in Critically Ill Patients: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in heart failure and myeloproliferative neoplasms: clinical applications and risk scores - a narrative review.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2026Review
- Postoperative Blood Glucose Trajectories are Associated with Inflammatory Markers and Functional Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated by Thrombectomy.Vascular health and risk management · 2026Article
- One Syndrome, Many Faces: A Unified Perspective on Heart Failure Phenotypes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Cardiac Endocrine Function and Hormonal Interplay in Pediatrics: From Development to Clinical Implications.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Biomarkers in Heart Failure: A Review and a Wish.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Review
- RNA-Seq transcriptomic landscape profiling of spontaneously hypertensive rats in youth treated with a ARNI versus ARB.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Article
- Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Blood Pressure and Proteinuria in Hypertensive Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Article
- Review
- The Genetic Polymorphisms ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Innovations in heart failure management: The role of cutting-edge biomarkers and multi-omics integration.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus · 2025Review
- Downregulation ofCurrent diabetes reviews · 2025Article
65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
After its discovery in the early 1980s, the natriuretic peptide (NP) system has been extensively characterized and its potential influence in the development and progression of heart failure (HF) has been investigated. HF is a syndrome characterized by the activation of different neurohormonal systems, predominantly the renin-angiotensin (Ang)-aldosterone system (RAAS) and the sympathetic nervous system (SNS), but also the NP system. Pharmacological interventions have been developed to counteract the neuroendocrine dysregulation, through the down modulation of RAAS with ACE (Ang-converting enzyme) inhibitors, ARBs (Ang receptor blockers) and mineralcorticoid antagonists and of SNS with β-blockers. In the last years, growing attention has been paid to the NP system. In the present review, we have summarized the current knowledge on the NP system, focusing on its role in HF and we provide an overview of the pharmacological attempts to modulate NP in HF: from the negative results of the study with neprilysin (NEP) inhibitors, alone or associated with an ACE inhibitor and vasopeptidase inhibitors, to the most recently and extremely encouraging results obtained with the new pharmacological class of Ang receptor and NEP inhibitor, currently defined ARNI (Ang receptor NEP inhibitor). Indeed, this new class of drugs to manage HF, supported by the recent results and a vast clinical development programme, may prompt a conceptual shift in the treatment of HF, moving from the inhibition of RAAS and SNS to a more integrated target to rebalance neurohormonal dysregulation in HF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.