Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26692108›Full record

ReviewNeurosurgery2016

Functional Gonadotroph Adenomas: Case Series and Report of Literature.

David J Cote, Timothy R Smith, Courtney N Sandler, Tina Gupta, Tejus A Bale, Wenya Linda Bi, Ian F Dunn, Umberto De Girolami, Whitney W Woodmansee, Ursula B Kaiser and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurosurgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Clinically functioning gonadotropin-secreting pituitary adenoma.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism case reports · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David J Cote*Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; ‡Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Hypertension, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; §Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Timothy R Smith
Courtney N Sandler
Tina Gupta
Tejus A Bale
Wenya Linda Bi
Ian F Dunn
Umberto De Girolami
Whitney W Woodmansee
Ursula B Kaiser
Edward R Laws
Harvard University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN HYPERTENSIONT32HL007609 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI ADLER, GAIL KURR · 1985 to 2022
$10.2M
Reproductive physiology of gonadotropin synthesisR37HD019938 · NICHD · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Ursula B. Kaiser · 2019 to 2026
$4.3M
REPRODUCTIVE PHYSIOLOGY OF LUTROPIN SYNTHESISR01HD019938 · NICHD · JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER · PI KAISER, URSULA B. · 1985 to 2017
$3.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007609NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD019938NICHD NIH HHS R37 HD019938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFunctional gonadotroph adenomas (FGAs) are rare tumors of the pituitary gland that secrete biologically active gonadotropins.

objectiveTo advance clinical understanding of FGAs.

methodsWe performed a retrospective review of adult patients who underwent resection of a pituitary lesion between August 1997 and October 2014 and remain under care at our center. We identified patients who had pathologic and biochemical confirmation of FGAs, as defined by a lack of serum follicle-stimulating hormone/luteinizing hormone suppression in the setting of elevated gonadal steroids, associated clinical symptoms, or both.

resultsFGAs were documented in 7 patients (5 men, 2 women) over a 17-year period. Clinical findings at presentation included visual field deficits in 5 patients, headache in 3, sexual dysfunction in 3, and ovarian cysts in both women. Each patient underwent lesion resection (6 via the endonasal transsphenoidal approach and 1 via a craniotomy with transsphenoidal reoperation). Analysis of tumor samples revealed immunopositivity for follicle-stimulating hormone/luteinizing hormone in 5 patients and FSH only in 2 patients. Postoperative follow-up (median, 10 months; range, 4-213 months) indicated remission in 6 of 7 patients.

conclusionAn FGA can pose both a diagnostic and a therapeutic challenge. The tumor is often diagnosed as a nonfunctioning macroadenoma after presenting with nonspecific symptoms and is the cause of significant morbidity. An FGA should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients harboring pituitary adenomas with reproductive dysfunction. Transsphenoidal resection is the initial treatment of choice and can reduce endocrine dysfunction, resolve headaches, improve visual impairment, and provide tissue for detailed analysis. ABBREVIATIONS: FGA, functional gonadotroph adenomaFSH, follicle-stimulating hormoneLH, luteinizing hormoneTSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone.

Indexed as

GonadotrophsAdenomaAdultAgedFemaleFollicle Stimulating HormoneHumansHypophysectomyMaleMiddle AgedPituitary NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesFollicle Stimulating Hormone

Identifiers

PMID26692108
PMCPMC4912468
OpenAlexW2321211318

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.