Evidence mapPaperPMID 26718418Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of clinical nutrition2016

Metabolic responses to a traditional Mexican diet compared with a commonly consumed US diet in women of Mexican descent: a randomized crossover feeding trial.

Margarita Santiago-Torres, Mario Kratz, Johanna W Lampe, Jean De Dieu Tapsoba, Kara L Breymeyer, Lisa Levy, Adriana Villaseñor, Ching-Yun Wang, Xiaoling Song, Marian L Neuhouser

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01369173 (Metabolic Response to Western vs. Indigenous Diets in Hispanic Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01369173 nacompletednot on this map

Metabolic Response to Western vs. Indigenous Diets in Hispanic Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorFred Hutchinson Cancer CenterRan2011 to 2015Enrolled50ConditionsHealthyArmsMexican or American foods
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Nutrients · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Margarita Santiago-TorresDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and msantiag@fredhutch.org.
Mario KratzDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and.
Johanna W LampeDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and.
Jean De Dieu TapsobaDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and.
Kara L BreymeyerDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and.
Lisa LevyDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and.
Adriana VillaseñorDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
Ching-Yun WangDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and.
Xiaoling SongDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and.
Marian L NeuhouserDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and.
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

Translational Bioimaging Core Shared ResourceP30CA015704 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · 1985 to 2025
$104.6M
VITAMIN AP30CA023074 · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · 1985 to 2025
$23.1M
Cancer Prevention Trng-Nutrition, Exercise &GeneticsR25CA094880 · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · 2002 to 2005
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30CA 015704NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023074NCI NIH HHS P50 CA148143NCI NIH HHS R25 CA094880
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMexican immigrants are disproportionally affected by diet-related risk of metabolic dysfunction. Whether adhering to a traditional Mexican diet or adopting a US diet contributes to metabolic changes associated with future risk of type 2 diabetes and other chronic diseases has not been investigated.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to test in a randomized crossover feeding trial the metabolic responses to a Mexican diet compared with a commonly consumed US diet.

designFirst- and second-generation healthy women of Mexican descent (n = 53) were randomly assigned in a crossover design to consume a Mexican or US diet for 24 d each, separated by a 28-d washout period. Diets were eucaloric and similar in macronutrient composition. The metabolic responses to diets were assessed by measuring fasting serum concentrations of glucose, insulin, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3), adiponectin, C-reactive protein (CRP), and interleukin 6 (IL-6), as well as the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) at the beginning and end of each period. Linear mixed models tested the intervention effect on the biomarkers, while adjusting for diet sequence, feeding period, baseline and washout biomarker concentrations, age, acculturation, and BMI.

resultsCompared with the US diet, the Mexican diet reduced insulin by 14% [geometric means (95% CIs): 9.3 (8.3, 10.3) compared with 8.0 (7.2, 8.9) μU/mL; P = 0.02], HOMA-IR by 15% [2.0 (1.8, 2.3) compared with 1.7 (1.6, 2.0); P = 0.02], and IGFBP-3 by 6% (mean ± SEM: 2420 ± 29 compared with 2299 ± 29 ng/mL; P < 0.01) and tended to reduce circulating concentrations of IGF-1 by 4% (149 ± 2.6 compared with 144 ± 2.5 ng/mL; P = 0.06). There was no significant intervention effect on serum concentrations of glucose, adiponectin, CRP, or IL-6 in the US compared with the Mexican diet.

conclusionCompared with the commonly consumed US diet, the traditional Mexican diet modestly improved insulin sensitivity under conditions of weight stability in healthy women of Mexican descent, while having no impact on biomarkers of inflammation. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01369173.

Indexed as

AcculturationInsulin ResistanceAdolescentAdultBiomarkersCross-Over StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2DietDiet, WesternEmigrants and ImmigrantsEnergy IntakeFemaleHumansInflammation MediatorsLinear ModelsMexican AmericansBiomarkersInflammation Mediatorsinflammatory responsesinsulin sensitivitymetabolic responsesMexican dietUS diet

Identifiers

PMID26718418
PMCPMC4733259
OpenAlexW2215567382

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.