Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26733830›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2015

To Act or Not to Act: Endocannabinoid/Dopamine Interactions in Decision-Making.

Giovanni Hernandez, Joseph F Cheer

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Giovanni HernandezFaculté de Pharmacie, Université de Montréal Montréal, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Joseph F CheerDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimore, Maryland, MD, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimore, Maryland, MD, USA.
Université de Montréal · CAUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Endogenous Cannabinoid Control of Reward SubstratesR01DA022340 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Joseph F Cheer · 2008 to 2026
$5.6M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA022340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decision-making is an ethologically adaptive construct that is impaired in multiple psychiatric disorders. Activity within the mesocorticolimbic dopamine system has been traditionally associated with decision-making. The endocannabinoid system through its actions on inhibitory and excitatory synapses modulates dopamine activity and decision-making. The aim of this brief review is to present a synopsis of available data obtained when the endocannabinoid system is manipulated and dopamine activity recorded. To this end, we review research using different behavioral paradigms to provide further insight into how this ubiquitous signaling system biases dopamine-related behaviors to regulate decision-making.

Indexed as

decision-makingdopamineendocannabinoidspre-clinical studiesreward

Identifiers

PMID26733830
PMCPMC4681836
OpenAlexW2233314341

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.