Ten numbers in the abstract
Where each one falls
Where it lands on the map
What it changes
Among 23 other studies
the abstract, start to end
… reached HbA1c <7% (57.4% vs. 44.7%; RR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.67) and …
… reached HbA1c <7% (52.6% vs. 41.6%; RR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.51) and …
… (55.6%) than with control (43.6%) (RR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.21 to 1.53).
… the risk of nausea (17.3% vs. 9.0%; RR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.69 to 4.12), …
… significant differences were noted (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 0.29 to 7.42)19.
… of those in the control groups (RR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.56 to 3.28).
… (62.3%) than with control (44.9%) (RR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.65 to 3.03).
… in control groups (36.9% vs. 32.1%; RR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.81).
… <7% (68.1% vs. 10.9%, respectively; RR, 4.97; 95% CI, 3.66 to 6.73) and …
… (13.4% vs. 6.9%, respectively; RR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.44 to 2.31)81113.
GLP-1 receptor agonists × glycemic controlhelps?replicated
GLP-1 receptor agonists × hypoglycaemiaharms?mixed
Metformin × hypoglycaemiaharms?no deciding trial