Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26756830›Full record

ReviewWomen's health (London, England)2016

Hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding.

Eva van der Meij, Mark Hans Emanuel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Women's health (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Cyclical progestogens for heavy menstrual bleeding.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Management of patients with elevated Self-BAT scores or other bleeding symptoms.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eva van der MeijDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mark Hans EmanuelDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem/Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hysterectomy is the most frequently performed major surgical intervention in gynecology. Although surgically removing the uterus is invasive, it represents the most definitive treatment option for heavy menstrual bleeding. In this article, we will discuss the indications for hysterectomy as a treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding, the different approaches to perform the hysterectomy, the complications which may occur during and after this procedure and finally the outcomes in comparison with other treatment options.

Indexed as

Women's HealthFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansHysterectomy, VaginalMenorrhagiaUterine Artery EmbolizationUterusabdominal hysterectomylaparoscopic hysterectomyoophorectomyrobot-assisted hysterectomysalpingectomysubtotal or supravaginal hysterectomytotal hysterectomyvaginal hysterectomy

Identifiers

PMID26756830
PMCPMC5779572

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.