ReviewDiabetes technology & therapeutics2016
Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Review of Successes, Challenges, and Opportunities.
Review in Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04102657 (Blood Glucose Differences Between Left Arm and Right Arm Using a Continuous Glucose), which is not on this map. Cited by 288 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Blood Glucose Differences Between Left Arm and Right Arm Using a Continuous Glucose
Who cites it
288 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 713 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enablers and barriers of e-learning utilising smart technologies in type 2 diabetes care for clinicians: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2025Pooled it
- Continuous glucose monitoring in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of barriers and opportunities for care improvement.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025Pooled it
- Effect of divergent continuous glucose monitoring technologies on glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2022Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Collective Evidences Investigating the Effect of Diabetes Monitoring Systems and Their Application in Health Care.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021Pooled it
- Tissue Response to Subcutaneous Infusion Catheter.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2020Pooled it
- The Effect of Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine U100 on Glucose Metrics Recorded During Continuous Glucose Monitoring in People With Type 1 Diabetes and Recurrent Nocturnal Severe Hypoglycemia.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025Trial
- Implantable and transcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring system: a randomized cross over trial comparing accuracy, efficacy and acceptance.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2022Trial
- Improved HbA1c and reduced glycaemic variability after 1-year intermittent use of flash glucose monitoring.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- Effect of a single bout of morning or afternoon exercise on glucose fluctuation in young healthy men.Physiological reports · 2021Trial
- Estimating plasma glucose with the FreeStyle Libre Pro continuous glucose monitor during oral glucose tolerance tests in youth without diabetes.Pediatric diabetes · 2019Trial
- Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Hypoglycaemia Risk During Paediatric DKA Treatment in the PICU: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- Gender differences in hypoglycaemia in type 1 and insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: the Hypo-METRICS study.Diabetologia · 2026Observational
- AI-Ready Multimodal Wearable Biosensors Beyond Glucose: Biofluid Sampling, Sensor Fusion, and Clinical Translation.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Associations Between Sleep Quality and Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Derived Metrics in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes.Journal of sleep research · 2026Article
- Continuous glucose monitoring and glycaemic variability in acute ischaemic stroke: a systematic review with narrative synthesis.Acta diabetologica · 2026Review
- The Evolving Landscape of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics in Type 1 Diabetes: Narrative Literature Review.JMIR diabetes · 2026Review
- Automated real-time feeding control for microbial electrolysis cell-anaerobic digestion systems using finite state machine.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Phase-specific intraoperative glycemic control in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation.World journal of transplantation · 2026Review
- A Minimally Invasive, Subcutaneous Biosensor Reliably Estimates Plasma Methotrexate Exposure and Quantifies Plasma-to-Tissue Transport Kinetics.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2026Article
- Transition from CSII to second-generation basal insulin analogues in hospitalized T2DM patients: a CGM-based study.BMC endocrine disorders · 2026Article
228 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) provides information unattainable by intermittent capillary blood glucose, including instantaneous real-time display of glucose level and rate of change of glucose, alerts and alarms for actual or impending hypo- and hyperglycemia, "24/7" coverage, and the ability to characterize glycemic variability. Progressively more accurate and precise, reasonably unobtrusive, small, comfortable, user-friendly devices connect to the Internet to share information and are sine qua non for a closed-loop artificial pancreas. CGM can inform, educate, motivate, and alert people with diabetes. CGM is medically indicated for patients with frequent, severe, or nocturnal hypoglycemia, especially in the presence of hypoglycemia unawareness. Surprisingly, despite tremendous advances, utilization of CGM has remained fairly limited to date. Barriers to use have included the following: (1) lack of Food and Drug Administration approval, to date, for insulin dosing ("nonadjuvant use") in the United States and for use in hospital and intensive care unit settings; (2) cost and variable reimbursement; (3) need for recalibrations; (4) periodic replacement of sensors; (5) day-to-day variability in glycemic patterns, which can limit the predictability of findings based on retrospective, masked "professional" use; (6) time, implicit costs, and inconvenience for uploading of data for retrospective analysis; (7) lack of fair and reasonable reimbursement for physician time; (8) inexperience and lack of training of physicians and other healthcare professionals regarding interpretation of CGM results; (9) lack of standardization of software methods for analysis of CGM data; and (10) need for professional medical organizations to develop and disseminate additional clinical practice guidelines regarding the role of CGM. Ongoing advances in technology and clinical research have addressed several of these barriers. Use of CGM in conjunction with an insulin pump with automated suspension of insulin infusion in response to actual observed or predicted hypoglycemia, as well as progressive refinement of closed-loop systems, is expected to dramatically enhance the clinical utility and utilization of CGM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.