Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26812415›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2016

The Incidence of End-Stage Renal Disease in the Diabetic (Compared to the Non-Diabetic) Population: A Systematic Review.

Maria Narres, Heiner Claessen, Sigrid Droste, Tatjana Kvitkina, Michael Koch, Oliver Kuss, Andrea Icks

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
17.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 217 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Education programmes for people with chronic kidney disease and diabetes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Incidence of Stroke in People With Diabetes Compared to Those Without Diabetes: A Systematic Review.Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Post-COVID-19 inflammation and sarcopenia in obese diabetic dialysis patients.Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Generating strategies for a national comeback in pancreas transplantation: A Delphi survey and US conference report.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maria NarresInstitute for Biometrics and Epidemiology, German Diabetes Center, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Heiner ClaessenInstitute for Biometrics and Epidemiology, German Diabetes Center, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Sigrid DrosteDepartment of Public Health, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Tatjana KvitkinaInstitute for Biometrics and Epidemiology, German Diabetes Center, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Michael KochCenter of Nephrology, Mettmann, Germany.
Oliver KussInstitute for Biometrics and Epidemiology, German Diabetes Center, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Andrea IcksInstitute for Biometrics and Epidemiology, German Diabetes Center, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Deutsches Diabetes-Zentrum e.V. · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEEvangelisches Krankenhaus Mettmann · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) in diabetes is a life threatening complication resulting in a poor prognosis for patients as well as high medical costs. The aims of this systematic review were (1) to evaluate the incidence of ESRD due to all causes and due to diabetic nephropathy in the diabetic population and differences between incidences of ESRD with respect to sex, ethnicity, age and regions, (2) to compare incidence rates in the diabetic and non-diabetic population, and (3) to investigate time trends. The systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA group guidelines by performing systematic literature searches in the biomedical databases until January 3rd 2015; thirty-two studies were included. Among patients with incident type 1 diabetes the 30-year cumulative incidence ranged from 3.3% to 7.8%. Among patients with prevalent diabetes, incidence rates of ESRD due to all causes ranged from 132.0 to 167.0 per 100,000 person-years, whereas incidence rates of ESRD due to diabetic nephropathy varied from 38.4 to 804.0 per 100,000 person-years. The incidence of ESRD in the diabetic population was higher compared to the non-diabetic population, and relative risks varied from 6.2 in the white population to 62.0 among Native Americans. The results regarding time trends were inconsistent. The review conducted demonstrates the considerable variation of incidences of ESRD among the diabetic population. Consistent findings included an excess risk when comparing the diabetic to the non-diabetic population and ethnic differences. We recommend that newly designed studies should use standardized methods for the determination of ESRD and population at risk.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic NephropathiesHumansIncidenceKidney Failure, ChronicRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID26812415
PMCPMC4727808
OpenAlexW2260347811

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.