Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26826156›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Comparative effectiveness of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors for controlling hyperglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Min Chen, Chun-Guang Xie, Hong Gao, Hui Zheng, Qin Chen, Jian-Qiao Fang

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Min ChenClinical Department, Teaching Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Chun-Guang XieClinical Department, Teaching Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Hong GaoClinical Department, Teaching Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Hui ZhengAcupuncture & Tuina College/The Third Teaching Hospital, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Qin ChenThe Third Clinical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jian-Qiao FangThe Third Clinical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNZhejiang Chinese Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAs a new class of glucose-lowering drugs, sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are effective for controlling hyperglycaemia, however, the relative effectiveness and safety of 6 recently available SGLT2 inhibitors have rarely been studied. Therefore, we aim to perform pairwise comparisons of the 6 SGLT2 inhibitors. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review and network meta-analysis will be conducted. Clinical studies that examine effectiveness and safety of either canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, ipragliflozin, tofogliflozin or luseogliflozin will be included. These studies will be systematically retrieved in MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library, from inception to November 2015. Two reviewers will independently screen for eligible studies and then extract data from the studies as well as assess risk of bias. Discrepancies in screening and data extraction will be arbitrated by a third reviewer. A traditional meta-analysis will be performed to combine the effect sizes calculated from head-to-head comparisons with a random effect model. The effect sizes computed from indirect comparisons will be further combined in a network meta-analysis. Heterogeneity will be tested with the Cochrane's Q statistic, and publication bias will be assessed using a funnel plot and the Egger's test. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Relative effectiveness and harms of the 6 SGLT2 inhibitors will be demonstrated through this systematic review and network meta-analysis. The result of the review will be disseminated through a peer-review journal and conference presentations. Patients, clinicians and policymakers will benefit from this review in selecting a SGLT2 inhibitor for glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42015025981.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBody WeightClinical ProtocolsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Glycated HemoglobinHumansHyperglycemiaHypoglycemic AgentsMeta-Analysis as TopicMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSodium-Glucose Transport ProteinsSystematic Reviews as TopicYoung AdultGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsSodium-Glucose Transport Proteinshyperglycemianetwork meta-analysisSGLT2 inhibitorsstudy protocol

Identifiers

PMID26826156
PMCPMC4735212
OpenAlexW2292032685

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.