Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26830357›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2016

Revealing new candidate genes for reproductive traits in pigs: combining Bayesian GWAS and functional pathways.

Lucas L Verardo, Fabyano F Silva, Marcos S Lopes, Ole Madsen, John W M Bastiaansen, Egbert F Knol, Mathew Kelly, Luis Varona, Paulo S Lopes, Simone E F Guimarães

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Single-step genome-wide association studies and post-GWAS analyses for the number of oocytes and embryos in Gir cattle.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Lucas L VerardoDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, 36570000, Brazil. lucas_verardo@yahoo.com.br.
Fabyano F SilvaDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, 36570000, Brazil. fabyanofonseca@ufv.br.
Marcos S LopesAnimal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen University, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands. Marcos.Lopes@topigsnorsvin.com.
Ole MadsenAnimal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen University, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands. ole.madsen@wur.nl.
John W M BastiaansenAnimal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen University, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands. john.bastiaansen@wur.nl.
Egbert F KnolTopigs Norsvin, Research Center, 6641 SZ, Beuningen, The Netherlands. egbert.knol@topigsnorsvin.com.
Mathew KellyQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia. m.kelly7@uq.edu.au.
Luis VaronaDepartamento de Anatomía, Embriología y Genética, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50013, Saragossa, Spain. lvarona@unizar.es.
Paulo S LopesDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, 36570000, Brazil. plopes@ufv.br.
Simone E F GuimarãesDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, 36570000, Brazil. sfacioni@ufv.br.
Universidade Federal de Viçosa · BRWageningen University & Research · NLTopigs Norsvin (Netherlands) · NLUniversidad de Zaragoza · ESUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReproductive traits such as number of stillborn piglets (SB) and number of teats (NT) have been evaluated in many genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Most of these GWAS were performed under the assumption that these traits were normally distributed. However, both SB and NT are discrete (e.g. count) variables. Therefore, it is necessary to test for better fit of other appropriate statistical models based on discrete distributions. In addition, although many GWAS have been performed, the biological meaning of the identified candidate genes, as well as their functional relationships still need to be better understood. Here, we performed and tested a Bayesian treatment of a GWAS model assuming a Poisson distribution for SB and NT in a commercial pig line. To explore the biological role of the genes that underlie SB and NT and identify the most likely candidate genes, we used the most significant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), to collect related genes and generated gene-transcription factor (TF) networks.

resultsComparisons of the Poisson and Gaussian distributions showed that the Poisson model was appropriate for SB, while the Gaussian was appropriate for NT. The fitted GWAS models indicated 18 and 65 significant SNPs with one and nine quantitative trait locus (QTL) regions within which 18 and 57 related genes were identified for SB and NT, respectively. Based on the related TF, we selected the most representative TF for each trait and constructed a gene-TF network of gene-gene interactions and identified new candidate genes.

conclusionsOur comparative analyses showed that the Poisson model presented the best fit for SB. Thus, to increase the accuracy of GWAS, counting models should be considered for this kind of trait. We identified multiple candidate genes (e.g. PTP4A2, NPHP1, and CYP24A1 for SB and YLPM1, SYNDIG1L, TGFB3, and VRTN for NT) and TF (e.g. NF-κB and KLF4 for SB and SOX9 and ELF5 for NT), which were consistent with known newborn survival traits (e.g. congenital heart disease in fetuses and kidney diseases and diabetes in the mother) and mammary gland biology (e.g. mammary gland development and body length).

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremGenome-Wide Association StudyAnimalsFemaleGene Regulatory NetworksGenotypeNormal DistributionPhenotypePoisson DistributionPolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LociReproductionSus scrofa

Identifiers

PMID26830357
PMCPMC4736284
OpenAlexW2280189751

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.