ReviewMetabolism: clinical and experimental2016
Guidelines on vitamin D replacement in bariatric surgery: Identification and systematic appraisal.
Review in Metabolism: clinical and experimental, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Role of Vitamin D Supplementation in Enhancing Muscle Strength Post-Surgery: A Systemic Review.Nutrients · 2025Pooled it
- Oral vitamin D supplementation for adults with obesity undergoing bariatric surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Vitamin D-The Nutritional Status of Post-Gastrectomy Gastric Cancer Patients-Systematic Review.Nutrients · 2022Pooled it
- Are There Ethnic Differences in Micronutrient Deficiencies in Preoperative Bariatric Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Obesity surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- A Spanish Society joint SECO and SEEDO approach to the Post-operative management of the patients undergoing surgery for obesity.Obesity surgery · 2019Guideline
- Effects of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy on Parathyroid Hormone, Vitamin D, Calcium, Phosphorus, and Albumin Levels.Obesity surgery · 2017Trial
- Vitamin DObesity surgery · 2017Trial
- Micronutrient Deficiencies in Obese Patients and Risk of Postoperative Fistula: A Forgotten Link in Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Prevalence and Associations of Preoperative Micronutrient Deficiencies in Bariatric Surgery Candidates with Severe Obesity.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2026Article
- Bone health up to five years after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a cross-sectional study during the COVID-19 pandemic.Acta cirurgica brasileira · 2026Article
- Association of Preoperative Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D with Longitudinal Body Mass Index After Bariatric Surgery-A Mediation Effect of Serum Albumin.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Preoperative Nutrition in Bariatric Surgery: A Narrative Review on Enhancing Surgical Success and Patient Outcomes.Nutrients · 2025Review
- Integrating Endocrine, Genomic, and Extra-Skeletal Benefits of Vitamin D into National and Regional Clinical Guidelines.Nutrients · 2024Review
- High-Volume Liposuction in Lipedema Patients: Effects on Serum Vitamin D.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- A Program of Life-Style Modification Improved the Body Weight and Micronutrient Status in Obese Patients after Bariatric Surgery.Nutrients · 2023Article
- Micronutrients in Pregnancy after Bariatric Surgery: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Micronutrient screening, monitoring, and supplementation in pregnancy after bariatric surgery.Obstetric medicine · 2022Review
- Vitamin D Deficiency in Patients with Morbid Obesity before and after Metabolic Bariatric Surgery.Nutrients · 2022Article
- Expert opinion on the preoperative medical optimization of adults with diabetes undergoing metabolic surgery.World journal of diabetes · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionBariatric surgery is the most effective therapeutic option to reduce weight in morbidly obese individuals, but it results in a number of mineral and vitamin deficiencies. Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) attempt to balance those benefits and harms to provide guidance to physicians and patients.
objectivesWe compare and evaluate the quality of the evidence and of the development process of current CPGs that provide recommendations on vitamin D replacement in patients undergoing bariatric surgery, using a validated tool.
methodsWe searched 4 databases, with no time restriction, to identify relevant and current CPGs. Two reviewers assessed eligibility and abstracted data, in duplicate. They evaluated the quality of CPGs development process using the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research, and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool that consists of 6 domains. A content expert verified those assessments.
resultsWe identified 3 eligible CPGs: (1) the Endocrine Society (ES) guidelines (2010); (2) the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), The Obesity Society (TOS), and the American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) guidelines (update 2013); and (3) the Interdisciplinary European (IE) guidelines on Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (latest update 2014). The ES and the AACE/TOS/ASMBS guidelines recommended high doses of vitamin D, varying from 3000IU daily to 50,000IU 1-3 times weekly. Vitamin D doses were not mentioned in the IE guidelines. The recommendations were based on a low quality of evidence, if any, or limited to a single high quality trial, for some outcomes. In terms of quality, only the IE guidelines described their search methodology but none of the CPGs provided details on evidence selection and appraisal. None of the three CPGs rigorously assessed the preferences of the target population, resource implications, and the applicability of these guidelines. According to the AGREE II tool, we rated the ES guidelines as average in quality, and the other two as low in quality.
conclusionCurrent CPGs recommendations on vitamin D supplementation in bariatric surgery differ between societies. They do not fulfill criteria for optimal guideline development, in part possibly due to limited resources, and are based on expert opinion. Thus, the pressing need for high quality randomized trials to inform CPGs, to be developed based on recommended standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.