Trial reportClinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society2016
Is adenosine a modulator of peripheral vasoconstrictor responses?
Trial report in Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLocal vasoconstrictor reflexes, the vascular myogenic response (VMR) and the veno-arterial reflex (VAR) are necessary for the maintenance of regional blood flow and systemic arterial blood pressure during orthostatic stress. Their molecular mechanism is unknown. We postulated that adenosine is involved in the activation of these local reflexes.
methodsThis hypothesis was tested in 10 healthy male volunteers (age 29 ± 3 years, BMI 24 ± 1 kg/m(2)). We used veno-occlusive plethysmography method for the assessment of forearm arterial blood flow at baseline and upon causing local venous congestion by inflating a second cuff to 40 mmHg for 4 min (VAR) and during placement of the forearm 40 cm below cardiac level for 4 min (VMR). These measurements were repeated after local infusion of either saline or aminophylline, non-selective adenosine blockers, using the Bier block method.
resultsRest baseline forearm blood flow was comparable in both arms. Saline did not affect the baseline forearm blood flow. However, aminophylline causes a significant increase in baseline forearm blood flow of 34 ± 6 % (p = 0.002). VAR demonstrated a decrease in forearm blood flow of 49 ± 4.5 % and after saline infusion it remained unchanged, 49 ± 5 % (p = 0.92). However, aminophylline causes significant decrease in the VAR by 35 ± 3 % (p = 0.02). But, both, saline and aminophylline did not affect the VMR.
conclusionArterial vasoconstriction triggered by venous congestion, which is the veno-arterial reflexis seems to be modulated by adenosine, at least partially. This "sensory" reflex requires further pharmacologic physiologic investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.