Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26860220›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2016

Psychometric properties of the newly translated creole multidimensional scale of perceived social support (MSPSS) and perceived adequacy of resource scale (PARS) and the relationship between perceived social support and resources in Haitian mothers in the US.

Jean Hannan, Marise Alce, Adrian Astros

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jean HannanFlorida International University, University Park, Nicole Wertheim College of Nursing and Health Sciences, 11200 SW 8th Street, AHC 3, Rm 324A, Miami, FL, 33199, USA. jhann001@fiu.edu.
Marise AlceJackson Memorial Hospital, 1601 N.W. 12 Avenue, Miami, FL, 33136, USA. mkoa11@yahoo.com.
Adrian AstrosFlorida International University, University Park, 11200 SW 8th Street, Miami, FL, 33199, USA. ad.r13nastros@gmail.com.

Funding

Nurse Practitioners Follow-up: Mobile Technology, Perinatal Outcomes, & ChargesSC2HD076043 · NICHD · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI HANNAN, JEAN L · 2012 to 2014
$424k
NICHD NIH HHS 1SC2HD076043-01NICHD NIH HHS SC2 HD076043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow income postpartum mothers with little to no social support have increased maternal and infant morbidity and mortality, especially those with limited English proficiency and limited accesses to resources. Haitians, a growing minority in the US are an understudied population excluded from most studies due to the lack of instruments in Creole. The most widely used instruments for measuring social support, the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) and Perceived Adequacy of Resource Scale (PARS), are not available in Creole. Currently, there are no published studies on the psychometric properties of the MSPSS or the PARS in Creole. Data from Haitian mothers are needed to identify potential postpartum mothers and infants most at risk of developing adverse maternal and infant outcomes from a lack of social support and perceived resources. The purpose of this study is to test the psychometrics of the newly-translated Creole instruments of the MSPSS and PARS with a sample of bilingual (Creole/English) mothers.

methodsThe MSPSS and PARS were translated and back translated from English to Creole. The adapted Creole versions of the instruments were tested using a convenience sample. A total of 85 Haitian mothers' completed both instruments in Creole and English 2 weeks apart.

resultInternal consistency reliability and stability were strong for both the MSPSS and PARS (.91-.99). The two instruments had strong reliability and validity for the translated Creole versions and similar to the English versions.

conclusionThe MSPSS and PARS are a valid measure of perceived social support and resources. Psychometric findings suggest that the newly translated Creole versions are good representations of the English versions indicating the translation process was successful. The newly translated instruments available in Creole provide non-English speaking Haitian mothers the opportunity to participate in studies.

Indexed as

Health ResourcesSocial SupportTranslationsAdultAgedFemaleHaitiHumansLanguageMiddle AgedMothersMultilingualismPostpartum PeriodPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID26860220
PMCPMC4748537

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.