Evidence mapPaperPMID 26860922Full record

SynthesisDrug safety2016

Safety Profile of Atorvastatin 80 mg: A Meta-Analysis of 17 Randomized Controlled Trials in 21,910 Participants.

Haixia Li, Cailian Wang, Shuo Zhang, Sihao Sun, Ruifei Li, Meijuan Zou, Gang Cheng

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drug safety, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03966859 (The Effect of Seven-Day Atorvastatin Administration on Emotional Processing, Reward Processing, and Inflammation in Healthy Volunteers), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03966859 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Seven-Day Atorvastatin Administration on Emotional Processing, Reward Processing, and Inflammation in Healthy Volunteers

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OxfordRan2019 to 2020Enrolled50ConditionsHealthyArmsAtorvastatin 20mg, Lactose placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Haixia LiShenyang Pharmaceutical University, 103 Wenhua Road, Shenhe District, Shenyang, China.
Cailian WangDepartment of Cardiology, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area, Shenhe District, Shenyang, China.
Shuo ZhangShenyang Pharmaceutical University, 103 Wenhua Road, Shenhe District, Shenyang, China.
Sihao SunShenyang Pharmaceutical University, 103 Wenhua Road, Shenhe District, Shenyang, China.
Ruifei LiShenyang Pharmaceutical University, 103 Wenhua Road, Shenhe District, Shenyang, China.
Meijuan ZouShenyang Pharmaceutical University, 103 Wenhua Road, Shenhe District, Shenyang, China.
Gang ChengShenyang Pharmaceutical University, 103 Wenhua Road, Shenhe District, Shenyang, China. chenggang63@hotmail.com.
Shenyang Pharmaceutical University · CNGeneral Hospital of Shenyang Military Region · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAtorvastatin 80 mg/day has significant benefits for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. To our knowledge, no meta-analysis focusing on assessing the safety profile of atorvastatin 80 mg/day has been performed; therefore, our aim was to evaluate the tolerability and adverse event (AE) patterns of this drug/dose.

methodsWe conducted a search of the Cochrane Library, EMBASE and PubMed databases through to July 2015 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The safety endpoints included the incidence of discontinuations due to AEs, transaminase elevation, creatine kinase (CK) elevation, myalgia and rhabdomyolysis. We also conducted subgroup analyses according to the length of follow-up and clinical condition.

resultsData from 17 RCTs involving 21,910 participants were included. Pooled analyses showed that atorvastatin 80 mg/day was less tolerable [risk ratio (RR) 1.29, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.17-1.42] and increased the risk of transaminase elevation (RR 4.59, 95 % CI 3.26-6.48) compared with controls. No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of the incidence of CK elevation (RR 1.38, 95 % CI 0.97-1.95), myalgia (RR 1.06, 95 % CI 0.93-1.20), and rhabdomyolysis (RR 0.67, 95 % CI 0.19-2.36).

conclusionsPatients treated with atorvastatin 80 mg/day, specifically patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), have a higher risk of transaminase elevation, which is not seen if patient exposure is less than 16 weeks. Atorvastatin 80 mg/day is less well-tolerated compared with controls, especially in patients with CAD, but an overall favorable tolerability profile is found if patient exposure is less than 52 weeks.

Indexed as

AtorvastatinCardiovascular DiseasesCerebrovascular DisordersHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRiskAtorvastatin

Identifiers

PMID26860922
OpenAlexW2254054388

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.