Caffeine does not significantly reduce the sensitivity of vasodilator stress MPI: Rebuttal.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Effects of caffeine intake prior to stress cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging on regadenoson- versus adenosine-induced hyperemia as measured by T1 mapping.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2017
   Article
2. Effect of aminophylline administration on the diagnostic yield of vasodilator myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Caffeine intake and myocardial perfusion imaging.2016
• Comment on
  Caffeine does not significantly reduce the sensitivity of vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion imaging.2016

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as