Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26884331›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2016

Mass Spectrometry Imaging and Identification of Peptides Associated with Cephalic Ganglia Regeneration in Schmidtea mediterranea.

Ta-Hsuan Ong, Elena V Romanova, Rachel H Roberts-Galbraith, Ning Yang, Tyler A Zimmerman, James J Collins, Ji Eun Lee, Neil L Kelleher, Phillip A Newmark, Jonathan V Sweedler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Neuropeptidomics of the Rat Habenular Nuclei.Journal of proteome research · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. TheDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ta-Hsuan OngFrom the Department of Chemistry, and the Beckman Institute.
Elena V RomanovaFrom the Department of Chemistry, and the Beckman Institute.
Rachel H Roberts-Galbraiththe Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, and.
Ning YangFrom the Department of Chemistry, and the Beckman Institute.
Tyler A ZimmermanFrom the Department of Chemistry, and the Beckman Institute.
James J Collinsthe Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, and.
Ji Eun LeeFrom the Department of Chemistry, and the Beckman Institute.
Neil L Kelleherthe Departments of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, Proteomics Center of Excellence, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60611.
Phillip A Newmarkthe Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, and.
Jonathan V SweedlerFrom the Department of Chemistry, and the Beckman Institute, jsweedle@illinois.edu.

Funding

The UIUC Neuroproteomics Center on Cell-Cell SignalingP30DA018310 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI Elena V Romanova · 2004 to 2026
$24.9M
SUBCELLULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF NEUROTRANSMITTERSR01NS031609 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI SWEEDLER, JONATHAN V. · 1998 to 2022
$6.2M
Stem cell proliferation and differentiation in planariaR01HD043403 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI Phillip A Newmark · 2003 to 2026
$5.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD043403NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA018310NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS031609
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue regeneration is a complex process that involves a mosaic of molecules that vary spatially and temporally. Insights into the chemical signaling underlying this process can be achieved with a multiplex and untargeted chemical imaging method such as mass spectrometry imaging (MSI), which can enablede novostudies of nervous system regeneration. A combination of MSI and multivariate statistics was used to differentiate peptide dynamics in the freshwater planarian flatwormSchmidtea mediterraneaat different time points during cephalic ganglia regeneration. A protocol was developed to makeS. mediterraneatissues amenable for MSI. MS ion images of planarian tissue sections allow changes in peptides and unknown compounds to be followed as a function of cephalic ganglia regeneration. In conjunction with fluorescence imaging, our results suggest that even though the cephalic ganglia structure is visible after 6 days of regeneration, the original chemical composition of these regenerated structures is regained only after 12 days. Differences were observed in many peptides, such as those derived from secreted peptide 4 and EYE53-1. Peptidomic analysis further identified multiple peptides from various known prohormones, histone proteins, and DNA- and RNA-binding proteins as being associated with the regeneration process. Mass spectrometry data also facilitated the identification of a new prohormone, which we have named secreted peptide prohormone 20 (SPP-20), and is up-regulated during regeneration in planarians.

Indexed as

Nerve RegenerationAnimalsGangliaGene Expression RegulationNeurogenesisNeuropeptidesOptical ImagingPlanariansSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationNeuropeptidesimagingmass spectrometry (MS)neurogenesisneuropeptideregeneration

Identifiers

PMID26884331
PMCPMC4825013

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.