Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26895877›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2016

"Nihilism" of chronic heart failure therapy in children and why effective therapy is withheld.

Dietmar Schranz, Norbert F Voelkel

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Diuretics in pediatrics.European journal of pediatrics · 2023
    Review
  9. Diagnosis and Management of Pediatric Heart Failure.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Congenital Heart Disease: The State-of-the-Art on Its Pharmacological Therapeutics.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dietmar SchranzPediatric Heart Center, Justus-Liebig University Clinic, Feulgenstr. 12, 30385, Giessen, Germany. dietmar.schranz@paediat.med.uni-giessen.de.
Norbert F VoelkelSchool of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
University of Giessen · DEVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledMajor advances in chronic heart failure (cHF) therapy have been achieved and documented in adult patients, while research regarding the mechanisms and therapy of cHF in children has lagged behind. Based on receptor physiological studies and pharmacological knowledge, treatment with specific ß1-adrenergic receptor blocker (ARB), tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I), and mineralocorticoid antagonists have to be recommended in children despite lack of sufficient data derived from prospective randomized studies. At our institution, bisoprolol, lisinopril, and spironolactone have been firmly established to treat systolic cHF, hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) following hybrid approach and congenital left-right shunt diseases, latest in patients where surgery has to be delayed. Chronic therapy with long-acting diuretics and fluid restriction are not advocated because short-term effects are achieved at the expense of further neuro-humoral stimulation. It remains unclear why diuretics are recommended although evidence-based studies, documenting long-term benefit, are missing. However, that is true for all currently used drugs for pediatric cHF.

conclusionThis review focuses on the prevailing "nihilism" of cHF therapy in children with the goal to encourage physicians to treat pediatric cHF with a rationally designed therapy, which combines available agents that have been shown to improve survival in adult patients with cHF. Because of the lack of clinical trials, which generate the needed evidence, surrogate variables like heart and respiratory rate, weight gain, image-derived data, and biomarkers should be monitored and used instead. The recommended pharmacological therapy for systolic heart failure is also provided as the basis for utilizing reversible pulmonary arterial banding (PAB) as a novel strategy in young children with dilative cardiomyopathy (DCM) with preserved right ventricular function. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Heart failure (HF) in children is a serious public health concern. • HF has numerous etiologies, but unspecific symptoms. • HF interplays among neuro-humoral, and molecular abnormalities. • Pediatric cHF-therapy is currently based on loop-diuretics, fluid restriction and digoxin. What is New: • Cardiac function analysis has to include cardiac synchrony and VVI. • Considering enormous potential of cardiac regeneration, therapy has to extend with selective ß1-ARB, tissue ACE-I and mineralocorticoid blockers, loop-diuretics avoided as ever possible. • Inhibition of the endogenous neuro-humoral stimulation is monitored by surrogate parameters as heart and breath rate and systolic and diastolic blood pressure. • Advocated HF therapy serves for regenerative strategies as reversible Pulmonary Artery Banding in DCM.

Indexed as

Practice Patterns, Physicians'Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsAdultAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsCardiotonic AgentsChildChild, PreschoolDisease ManagementDiureticsHeart FailureHumansInfantAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsCardiotonic AgentsDiureticsBisoprololChronic heart failureInfants and childrenLisinoprilPulmonary artery bandingSpironolactone

Identifiers

PMID26895877
PMCPMC4806719
OpenAlexW2275032854

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.