Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26926831›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2016

Hyperdeactivation of the Default Mode Network in People With Schizophrenia When Focusing Attention in Space.

Britta Hahn, Alexander N Harvey, James M Gold, Bernard A Fischer, William R Keller, Thomas J Ross, Elliot A Stein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Default Mode Network Functional Connectivity As a Transdiagnostic Biomarker of Cognitive Function.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2025
    Review
  3. Attention in Schizophrenia.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Britta HahnMaryland Psychiatric Research Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; bhahn@mprc.umaryland.edu.
Alexander N HarveyMaryland Psychiatric Research Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD;
James M GoldMaryland Psychiatric Research Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD;
Bernard A FischerMaryland Psychiatric Research Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD;
William R KellerMaryland Psychiatric Research Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD;
Thomas J RossNeuroimaging Research Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse-Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, MD.
Elliot A SteinNeuroimaging Research Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse-Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, MD.

Funding

Addiction comorbidity and vulnerabilityZIADA000583 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI STEIN, ELLIOT A · 2011 to 2018
$3.1M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When studying selective attention in people with schizophrenia (PSZ), a counterintuitive but replicated finding has been that PSZ display larger performance benefits than healthy control subjects (HCS) by cues that predicts the location of a target stimulus relative to non-predictive cues. Possible explanations are that PSZ hyperfocus attention in response to predictive cues, or that an inability to maintain a broad attentional window impairs performance when the cue is non-predictive. Over-recruitment of regions involved in top-down focusing of spatial attention in response to predictive cues would support the former possibility, and an inappropriate recruitment of these regions in response to non-predictive cues the latter. We probed regions of the dorsal attention network while PSZ (N = 20) and HCS (N = 20) performed a visuospatial attention task. A central cue either predicted at which of 4 peripheral locations a target signal would appear, or it gave no information about the target location. As observed previously, PSZ displayed a larger reaction time difference between predictive and non-predictive cue trials than HCS. Activity in frontoparietal and occipital regions was greater for predictive than non-predictive cues. This effect was almost identical between PSZ and HCS. There was no sign of over-recruitment when the cue was predictive, or of inappropriate recruitment when the cue was non-predictive. However, PSZ differed from HCS in their cue-dependent deactivation of the default mode network. Unexpectedly, PSZ displayed significantly greater deactivation than HCS in predictive cue trials, which may reflect a tendency to expend more processing resources when focusing attention in space.

Indexed as

CuesAdultAttentionCerebral CortexFemaleFunctional NeuroimagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNerve NetPsychomotor PerformanceSchizophreniaSpace PerceptionYoung Adultdefault networkfMRItop-down

Identifiers

PMID26926831
PMCPMC4988736

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.