ReviewMutation research2016
FANCJ at the FORK.
Review in Mutation research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rare genetic diseases associated with G-quadruplex-induced replication stress.Communications biology · 2026Review
- The Genetic and Molecular Analyses of Rare Candidate GermlineInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- How DNA secondary structures drive replication fork instability.DNA repair · 2025Review
- Purification and biochemical characterization of the G4 resolvase and DNA helicase FANCJ.Methods in enzymology · 2024Article
- Comprehensive Mutational Analysis of the BRCA1-Associated DNA Helicase and Tumor-Suppressor FANCJ/BACH1/BRIP1.Molecular cancer research : MCR · 2021Article
- The repair geneOncology reviews · 2021Article
- Review
- SOG1 activator and MYB3R repressors regulate a complex DNA damage network inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- BLM's balancing act and the involvement of FANCJ in DNA repair.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2018Article
- Fork Protection and Therapy Resistance in Hereditary Breast Cancer.Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology · 2017Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.