Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26933515›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2016

A model qualification method for mechanistic physiological QSP models to support model-informed drug development.

C M Friedrich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. What Is QSP and Why Does It Exist?: A Brief History.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Model-informed drug discovery and development approaches to inform clinical trial design and regulatory decisions: A primer for the MENA region.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. An industry perspective on current QSP trends in drug development.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2024
    Article
  16. Towards a comprehensive assessment of QSP models: what would it take?Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2024
    Review
  17. Current practices for QSP model assessment: an IQ consortium survey.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. In Silico Clinical Trials: Is It Possible?Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

C M FriedrichRosa & Co, LLC San Francisco California USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanistic physiological modeling is a scientific method that combines available data with scientific knowledge and engineering approaches to facilitate better understanding of biological systems, improve decision-making, reduce risk, and increase efficiency in drug discovery and development. It is a type of quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) approach that places drug-specific properties in the context of disease biology. This tutorial provides a broadly applicable model qualification method (MQM) to ensure that mechanistic physiological models are fit for their intended purposes.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryHumansModels, BiologicalSystems Biology

Identifiers

PMID26933515
PMCPMC4761232

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.