Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26966045›Full record

SynthesisJournal of immunological methods2016

Comparative genomics analysis of mononuclear phagocyte subsets confirms homology between lymphoid tissue-resident and dermal XCR1(+) DCs in mouse and human and distinguishes them from Langerhans cells.

Sabrina Carpentier, Thien-Phong Vu Manh, Rabie Chelbi, Sandrine Henri, Bernard Malissen, Muzlifah Haniffa, Florent Ginhoux, Marc Dalod

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of immunological methods, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Guidelines for mouse and human DC generation.European journal of immunology · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. CD8Immunity · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Prenatal Development and Function of Human Mononuclear Phagocytes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sabrina CarpentierMi-mAbs (C/O Centre d'Immunologie de Marseille-Luminy), F-13009 Marseille, France.
Thien-Phong Vu ManhCentre d'Immunologie de Marseille-Luminy, Aix Marseille Université UM2, Inserm, U1104, CNRS UMR7280, F-13288 Marseille Cedex 09, France.
Rabie ChelbiCentre d'Immunologie de Marseille-Luminy, Aix Marseille Université UM2, Inserm, U1104, CNRS UMR7280, F-13288 Marseille Cedex 09, France.
Sandrine HenriCentre d'Immunologie de Marseille-Luminy, Aix Marseille Université UM2, Inserm, U1104, CNRS UMR7280, F-13288 Marseille Cedex 09, France.
Bernard MalissenCentre d'Immunologie de Marseille-Luminy, Aix Marseille Université UM2, Inserm, U1104, CNRS UMR7280, F-13288 Marseille Cedex 09, France.
Muzlifah HaniffaHuman Dendritic Cell Laboratory, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. Electronic address: m.a.haniffa@newcastle.ac.uk.
Florent GinhouxSingapore Immunology Network (SIgN), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore. Electronic address: Florent_Ginhoux@immunol.a-star.edu.sg.
Marc DalodCentre d'Immunologie de Marseille-Luminy, Aix Marseille Université UM2, Inserm, U1104, CNRS UMR7280, F-13288 Marseille Cedex 09, France. Electronic address: dalod@ciml.univ-mrs.fr.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SGCentre d’Immunologie de Marseille-Luminy · FRNewcastle University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dendritic cells (DC) are mononuclear phagocytes which exhibit a branching (dendritic) morphology and excel at naïve T cell activation. DC encompass several subsets initially identified by their expression of cell surface molecules and later shown to possess distinct functions. DC subset differentiation is orchestrated by transcription factors, growth factors and cytokines. Identifying DC subsets is challenging as very few cell surface molecules are uniquely expressed on any one of these cell populations. There is no standard consensus to identify mononuclear phagocyte subsets; varying antigens are employed depending on the tissue and animal species studied and between laboratories. This has led to confusion in how to accurately define and classify DCs across tissues and between species. Here we report a comparative genomics strategy that enables universal definition of DC and other mononuclear phagocyte subsets across species. We performed a meta-analysis of several public datasets of human and mouse mononuclear phagocyte subsets isolated from blood, spleen, skin or cutaneous lymph nodes, including by using a novel and user friendly software, BubbleGUM, which generates and integrates gene signatures for high throughput gene set enrichment analysis. This analysis demonstrates the equivalence between human and mouse skin XCR1(+) DCs, and between mouse and human Langerhans cells.

Indexed as

Dendritic CellsGenomicsSkinAnimalsCell DifferentiationComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationGenetic MarkersHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLangerhans CellsLymphoid TissueMicePhenotypeGenetic MarkersReceptors, ChemokineReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledXC chemokine receptor 1, mouseXCR1 protein, humanBioinformaticsComparative genomicsDendritic cellsLangerhans cellsSkinXCR1

Identifiers

PMID26966045
PMCPMC4859332
OpenAlexW2310795728

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.