Evidence mapPaperPMID 27009108Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

Comparison of exenatide with biphasic insulin aspart 30 on glucose variability in type 2 diabetes: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Shaoyong Xu, Xiangyang Liu, Jie Ming, Qiuhe Ji

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02449603 (Comparison of Exenatide vs. Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 on Glucose Variability in Type 2 Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02449603 phase4completednot on this map

Comparison of Exenatide vs. Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 on Glucose Variability in Type 2 Diabetes : a Randomised Open Parallel-controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorXijing HospitalRan2015 to 2018Enrolled150ConditionsType 2 Diabetes MellitusArmsExenatide, Biphasic insulin Aspart 30
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shaoyong XuDepartment of Endocrinology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 169 Changle Road West, Xi'an, 710032, China.
Xiangyang LiuDepartment of Endocrinology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 169 Changle Road West, Xi'an, 710032, China.
Jie MingDepartment of Endocrinology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 169 Changle Road West, Xi'an, 710032, China.
Qiuhe JiDepartment of Endocrinology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 169 Changle Road West, Xi'an, 710032, China. qiuheji@hotmail.com.
Air Force Medical University · CNXijing Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApart from the mean level of glycemic control, the extent of glucose excursions is another important issue to consider in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) management. Studies have showed that fluctuations of glucose seem to have more deleterious effects than sustained hyperglycemia in the development of diabetic complications as acute glucose swings activate the oxidative stress. However, until now, no randomized controlled trials have been conducted with the primary aim to evaluate glycemic fluctuation in the comparison between twice-daily exenatide and other treatment paradigms (for example, biphasic insulin aspart 30). METHODS/

designThis multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel trial includes a 1-week screening period and a 16-week treatment period. After the screening period, 150 patients with confirmed type 2 diabetes who are treated with stable, maximum-tolerated doses of metformin will be randomly assigned to one of two groups for antihyperglycemic therapies: exenatide and biphasic insulin aspart 30. The treatment with exenatide will be initiated at a low dose of 5 μg twice a day for 4 weeks and then titrated up to a standard dose of 10 ug twice a day until the completion of the study. The adjustment of insulin dose is instructed to achieve an optimal balance between glycemic control and the risk of hypoglycemia as dictated by clinical practice. The primary outcome is the absolute change of mean amplitude of glycemic excursion from baseline to week 16, which is calculated based on a real-time continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS). DISCUSSION: This is the first randomized controlled trial using a CGMS to evaluate glycemic fluctuation between twice-daily exenatide and insulin aspart 30, which will provide beneficial evidence of exenatide usage in patients with T2DM. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02449603 . Date of registration: 11 May 2015.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBiomarkersBiphasic InsulinsBlood GlucoseChinaClinical ProtocolsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ExenatideFemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsIncretinsInsulin AspartInsulin, IsophaneBiomarkersBiphasic InsulinsBlood GlucoseExenatideHypoglycemic AgentsIncretinsInsulin Aspartinsulin aspart, insulin aspart protamine drug combination 30:70Insulin, IsophanePeptidesVenoms

Identifiers

PMID27009108
PMCPMC4806460
OpenAlexW2311050353

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.