Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27015023›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2016

Protein quality control in the nucleus.

Ramon D Jones, Richard G Gardner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Prefoldin Function in Cellular Protein Homeostasis and Human Diseases.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. From Pathogenesis to Novel Therapeutics for Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3: Evading Potholes on the Way to Translation.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ramon D JonesDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Washington, Box 357280, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Richard G GardnerDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Washington, Box 357280, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. Electronic address: gardnerr@uw.edu.

Funding

TRAINING IN MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGYT32GM007270 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RAIBLE, DAVID W · 1985 to 2020
$21.0M
Pharmacological Sciences SupplementT32GM007750 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ATKINS, WILLIAM M · 1985 to 2023
$12.6M
Identifying and characterizing protein quality control mechanisms in the nucleusR01AG031136 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GARDNER, RICHARD GEORGE · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG031136NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007270NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nucleus is the repository for the eukaryotic cell's genetic blueprint, which must be protected from harm to ensure survival. Multiple quality control (QC) pathways operate in the nucleus to maintain the integrity of the DNA, the fidelity of the DNA code during replication, its transcription into mRNA, and the functional structure of the proteins that are required for DNA maintenance, mRNA transcription, and other important nuclear processes. Although we understand a great deal about DNA and RNA QC mechanisms, we know far less about nuclear protein quality control (PQC) mechanisms despite that fact that many human diseases are causally linked to protein misfolding in the nucleus. In this review, we discuss what is known about nuclear PQC and we highlight new questions that have emerged from recent developments in nuclear PQC studies.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell NucleusDNA ReplicationEukaryotic CellsHumansNuclear ProteinsProtein FoldingRNA, MessengerTranscription, GeneticYeastsNuclear ProteinsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID27015023
PMCPMC4887289

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.