Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27019347›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2016

Impact evaluation of a community-based intervention for prevention of cardiovascular diseases in the slums of Nairobi: the SCALE-UP study.

Steven van de Vijver, Samuel Oji Oti, Gabriela B Gomez, Charles Agyemang, Thaddaeus Egondi, Eric Moll van Charante, Lizzy M Brewster, Catherine Hankins, Zlata Tanovic, Alex Ezeh and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Effectiveness Evaluation of a Primary School-Based Intervention against Heatwaves in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Mapping the Current and Future Noncommunicable Disease Burden in Kenya by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Status: A Modeling Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Steven van de VijverAfrican Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.
Samuel Oji OtiAfrican Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.
Gabriela B GomezDepartment of Global Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam and Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Charles AgyemangDepartment of Public Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Thaddaeus EgondiAfrican Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.
Eric Moll van CharanteDepartment of Family Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lizzy M BrewsterDepartment of Public Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Catherine HankinsDepartment of Global Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam and Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Zlata TanovicAmsterdam Institute for International Development (AIID), Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Alex EzehAfrican Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.
Catherine KyobutungiAfrican Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.
Karien StronksDepartment of Public Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
University of Amsterdam · NLAfrican Population and Health Research Center · KEAmsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development · NLAcademic Medical Center · NLLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA combination of increasing urbanization, behaviour change, and lack of health services in slums put the urban poor specifically at risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a community-based CVD prevention intervention on blood pressure (BP) and other CVD risk factors in a slum setting in Nairobi, Kenya.

designProspective intervention study includes awareness campaigns, household visits for screening, and referral and treatment of people with hypertension. The primary outcome was overall change in mean systolic blood pressure (SBP), while secondary outcomes were changes in awareness of hypertension and other CVD risk factors. We evaluated the intervention's impact through consecutive cross-sectional surveys at baseline and after 18 months, comparing outcomes of intervention and control group, through a difference-in-difference method.

resultsWe screened 1,531 and 1,233 participants in the intervention and control sites. We observed a significant reduction in mean SBP when comparing before and after measurements in both intervention and control groups, -2.75 mmHg (95% CI -4.33 to -1.18, p=0.001) and -1.67 mmHg (95% CI -3.17 to -0.17, p=0.029), respectively. Among people with hypertension at baseline, SBP was reduced by -14.82 mmHg (95% CI -18.04 to -11.61, p<0.001) in the intervention and -14.05 (95% CI -17.71 to -10.38, p<0.001) at the control site. However, comparing these two groups, we found no difference in changes in mean SBP or hypertension prevalence.

conclusionsWe found significant declines in SBP over time in both intervention and control groups. However, we found no additional effect of a community-based intervention involving awareness campaigns, screening, referral, and treatment. Possible explanations include the beneficial effect of baseline measurements in the control group on behaviour and related BP levels, and the limited success of treatment and suboptimal adherence in the intervention group.

Indexed as

Poverty AreasAdultBlood Pressure DeterminationCardiovascular DiseasesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PromotionHumansHypertensionKenyaMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceProspective StudiesRisk Factorsawarenessblood pressurecardiovascular diseasehypertensionKenyapreventionslumtreatmenturban poor

Identifiers

PMID27019347
PMCPMC4808680
OpenAlexW2303785866

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.