Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27058899›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

eNOS polymorphisms and clinical outcome in advanced HCC patients receiving sorafenib: final results of the ePHAS study.

Andrea Casadei Gardini, Giorgia Marisi, Luca Faloppi, Emanuela Scarpi, Francesco Giuseppe Foschi, Massimo Iavarone, Gianfranco Lauletta, Jody Corbelli, Martina Valgiusti, Floriana Facchetti and 10 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Is the era of sorafenib over? A review of the literature.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2020
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Cancers · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea Casadei GardiniDepartment of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
Giorgia MarisiBiosciences Laboratory, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
Luca FaloppiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Emanuela ScarpiUnit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
Francesco Giuseppe FoschiDPT Internal Medicine, Faenza Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Faenza, Italy.
Massimo IavaroneA.M.&A. Migliavacca Center for Liver Disease, 1st Division of Gastroenterology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Maggiore Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Gianfranco LaulettaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Internal Medicine "G. Baccelli", University of Bari "A. Moro", Bari, Italy.
Jody CorbelliDepartment of Medical Oncology, Faenza Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Faenza, Italy.
Martina ValgiustiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
Floriana FacchettiA.M.&A. Migliavacca Center for Liver Disease, 1st Division of Gastroenterology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Maggiore Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Cristina Della CorteA.M.&A. Migliavacca Center for Liver Disease, 1st Division of Gastroenterology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Maggiore Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Luca Maria NeriDepartment of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Stefano TamberiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Faenza Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Faenza, Italy.
Stefano CascinuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Mario ScartozziDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Dino AmadoriDepartment of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
Oriana NanniUnit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
Elena TentiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
Paola UliviBiosciences Laboratory, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
Giovanni Luca FrassinetiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITOspedale per gli Infermi · ITUniversity of Milan · ITAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti · ITIstituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Cagliari · ITUniversity of Ferrara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sorafenib may reduce endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activity by inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGF-R), leading to a decrease in nitric oxide production. In the Italian multicenter ePHAS (eNOS polymorphisms in HCC and sorafenib) study, we analyzed the role of eNOS polymorphisms in relation to clinical outcome in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receiving sorafenib. Our retrospective study included a training cohort of 41 HCC patients and a validation cohort of 87 HCC patients, all undergoing sorafenib treatment. Three eNOS polymorphisms (eNOS -786T>C, eNOS VNTR 27bp 4a/b and eNOS+894G>T) were analyzed by direct sequencing or Real Time PCR in relation to progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (log-rank test). In univariate analysis, training cohort patients homozygous for eNOS haplotype (HT1:T-4b at eNOS-786/eNOS VNTR) had a lower median PFS (2.6 vs. 5.8 months, P < 0.0001) and OS (3.2 vs.14.6 months, P = 0.024) than those with other haplotypes. In the validation set, patients homozygous for HT1 had a lower median PFS (2.0 vs. 6.7 months, P < 0.0001) and OS (6.4 vs.18.0 months, P < 0.0001) than those with other haplotypes. Multivariate analysis confirmed this haplotype as the only independent prognostic factor. Our results suggest that haplotype HT1 in the eNOS gene may be capable of identifying a subset of HCC patients who are resistant to sorafenib.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, HepatocellularCase-Control StudiesDisease-Free SurvivalDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleGenotypeHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedAntineoplastic AgentsNiacinamideNitric Oxide Synthase Type IIINOS3 protein, humanPhenylurea CompoundsSorafenibangiogenesisbiomarkersendothelial nitric oxide synthasehepatocellular carcinomasingle nucleotide polymorphisms

Identifiers

PMID27058899
PMCPMC5053704
OpenAlexW2341538586

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.